[1] Li Sui, , Shi Tiemao, et al. Scales, methods and technical analysisof China’s residential environment evaluation [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2009, 25 (2): 274-277. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2009.02.028]

Copy

Scales, methods and technical analysisof China’s residential environment evaluation()

我国居住环境评价的尺度、方法与技术分析

Share：

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:

25

Issue:

2009 2

Page:

274-277

Research Field:

Environmental Science and Engineering

Publishing date:

2009-06-30

Info

Title:

Scales, methods and technical analysisof China’s residential environment evaluation

我国居住环境评价的尺度、方法与技术分析

Author(s):

Li Sui¹;  2;  3;  Shi Tiemao²;  Zhou Le⁴

¹Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
²School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenyang Jian Zhu University, Shenyang 110168, China
³Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
⁴School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China

李绥¹;  2;  3;  石铁矛²;  周乐⁴

¹中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016; ²沈阳建筑大学建筑与规划学院, 沈阳 110168; ³中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049; ⁴沈阳大学建筑工程学院, 沈阳 110044

Keywords:

residential environment;  evaluation system;  scale;  threshold value;  weight;  evaluation model;  geographic information system(GIS)

居住环境;  评价体系;  尺度;  阈值;  权重;  评价模型;  地理信息系统

PACS:

X821

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2009.02.028

Abstract:

To improve China’s residential environment evaluation system and enhance its guiding role, current research results are analyzed and summarized from three aspects including research scales, evaluation methods and applied technology by means of comparison, induction and empirical application.The guiding role of the current macro-scale evaluation system of urban planning and construction is generally not obvious, whereas the guiding role of medium and micro-scale systems to the improvement of residential environments is improving.There are diversified methods for determining the threshold values and the weights of indices in China’s evaluation system.For instance, the analytic hierarchy process(AHP)method is adopted to determine the weights of indices.The advantages and disadvantages of the method are analyzed on the basis of empirical calculation.In the course of comprehensive analyses, a nonlinear model can reflect interactions among indices more than a linear model;the evaluation model under the ARCGIS platform prevails since it combines space and attribute, and it has intuitive results.So far, the methodological system of China’s residential environment evaluation has not been established;its subject coverage and research category should be expanded, and its guiding role should be enhanced.

为了完善我国居住环境评价体系并加强其指导作用, 通过对比、归纳与实证应用等方法从研究尺度、评价方法和应用技术3个方面对现有研究成果进行分析与总结.现有宏观尺度评价体系普遍对城市规划建设的指导作用不明显, 而中观与微观尺度评价体系对改善住区环境的指导作用则逐渐加强.我国评价体系中确定指标阈值与权重的方法多元化, 以AHP法确定权重为例, 在实证计算的基础上, 分析了该方法的优势与不足.在综合评价过程中, 非线性模型比线性模型更能够体现各指标间相互影响的关系;ARCGIS平台下的评价模型具有空间与属性一体化的优势, 而且结果直观.我国居住环境评价的方法体系仍未系统建立, 学科领域、研究范畴需要拓宽, 指导作用有待加强.

References:

[1] Research Team on Green Olympic Buildings.Assessment system for green building of Beijing Olympic[M].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2003:7-9.(in Chinese)
[2] Wu Liangyong.Introduction to the science of human settlements [M].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2001.(in Chinese)
[3] Yasushi Asam.Appraisal methods on residential environment and its theory [M].Translated by Gao Xiaolu.Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2006:25-27.(in Chinese)
[4] Zhang Wenzhong.Index system and method of residential environmental evaluation in inner cities [J].Scientia Geographica Sinic, 2007, 27(1):17-23.(in Chinese)
[5] Yu Chunlong, Zhou Ruoqi.Research on the suitable appraisal method of the human residential environment in small basin based on grid data [J].Huazhong Architecture, 2008, 26(1):4-7.(in Chinese)
[6] Currie R, Thacker C.Quality of the urban environment as perceived by residents of slow and fast growth cities [J].Social Indicators Research, 1986, 18(1):95-118.
[7] Connerly C E, Marans R W.Comparing two global measures of perceived neighborhood quality [J].Social Indicators Research, 1985, 7(1):29-47.
[8] Nie Meisheng, Qin Youguo, Jiang Yi. Technical appraisal handbook for ecological residences in China [M].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2007.(in Chinese)
[9] Ministry of Construction of China.GB/T 50378—2006 Evaluation standard for green building [S].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2003.(in Chinese)
[10] Liu Qibo, Zhou Ruoqi.Comprehensive appraisal method to green residence and its design criteria [M].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2006.(in Chinese)
[11] Pacione M.The use of objective and subjective measures of life quality in human geography [J].Progress in Human Geography, 1982, 6:495-514.
[12] Liu Qibo, Zhou Ruoqi.Applying improvable topsis method in green building’s synthetical assessment [J].Optimization of Capital Construction, 2001, 22(5):30-32.(in Chinese)
[13] GBT05.2005 International initiative for a sustainable built environment(iiSBE)[S/OL].(2005-01-27)[2007-09-20].http//www.iisbe.org/iisbe/gbc2k5/gbc2k5-start.html.

Memo

Memo:

Biographies: Li Sui(1977—), male, graduate, lecturer;Shi Tiemao(corresponding author), male, professor, tiemaos@sjzu.edu.cn.
Foundation items: The National Key Technology R& D Program during the 11th Five-Year Plan(No.2006BAJ11B04-2), the Soft Science Project of the Ministry of Construction of China(No.2008-R2-25).
Citation: Li Sui, Shi Tiemao, Zhou Le.Scales, methods and technical analysis of China’s residential environment evaluation[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2009, 25(2):274-277.

Common functions