[1] Li Sui, , Shi Tiemao, et al. Scales, methods and technical analysisof China’s residential environment evaluation [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2009, 25 (2): 274-277. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2009.02.028]

Copy

Scales, methods and technical analysisof China’s residential environment evaluation()

Share：

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:

25

Issue:

2009 2

Page:

274-277

Research Field:

Environmental Science and Engineering

Publishing date:

2009-06-30

Info

Title:

Scales, methods and technical analysisof China’s residential environment evaluation

Author(s):

Li Sui¹;  2;  3;  Shi Tiemao²;  Zhou Le⁴

¹Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
²School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenyang Jian Zhu University, Shenyang 110168, China
³Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
⁴School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China

Keywords:

residential environment;  evaluation system;  scale;  threshold value;  weight;  evaluation model;  geographic information system(GIS)

PACS:

X821

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2009.02.028

Abstract:

To improve China’s residential environment evaluation system and enhance its guiding role, current research results are analyzed and summarized from three aspects including research scales, evaluation methods and applied technology by means of comparison, induction and empirical application.The guiding role of the current macro-scale evaluation system of urban planning and construction is generally not obvious, whereas the guiding role of medium and micro-scale systems to the improvement of residential environments is improving.There are diversified methods for determining the threshold values and the weights of indices in China’s evaluation system.For instance, the analytic hierarchy process(AHP)method is adopted to determine the weights of indices.The advantages and disadvantages of the method are analyzed on the basis of empirical calculation.In the course of comprehensive analyses, a nonlinear model can reflect interactions among indices more than a linear model;the evaluation model under the ARCGIS platform prevails since it combines space and attribute, and it has intuitive results.So far, the methodological system of China’s residential environment evaluation has not been established;its subject coverage and research category should be expanded, and its guiding role should be enhanced.

References:

[1] Research Team on Green Olympic Buildings.Assessment system for green building of Beijing Olympic[M].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2003:7-9.(in Chinese)
[2] Wu Liangyong.Introduction to the science of human settlements [M].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2001.(in Chinese)
[3] Yasushi Asam.Appraisal methods on residential environment and its theory [M].Translated by Gao Xiaolu.Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2006:25-27.(in Chinese)
[4] Zhang Wenzhong.Index system and method of residential environmental evaluation in inner cities [J].Scientia Geographica Sinic, 2007, 27(1):17-23.(in Chinese)
[5] Yu Chunlong, Zhou Ruoqi.Research on the suitable appraisal method of the human residential environment in small basin based on grid data [J].Huazhong Architecture, 2008, 26(1):4-7.(in Chinese)
[6] Currie R, Thacker C.Quality of the urban environment as perceived by residents of slow and fast growth cities [J].Social Indicators Research, 1986, 18(1):95-118.
[7] Connerly C E, Marans R W.Comparing two global measures of perceived neighborhood quality [J].Social Indicators Research, 1985, 7(1):29-47.
[8] Nie Meisheng, Qin Youguo, Jiang Yi. Technical appraisal handbook for ecological residences in China [M].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2007.(in Chinese)
[9] Ministry of Construction of China.GB/T 50378—2006 Evaluation standard for green building [S].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2003.(in Chinese)
[10] Liu Qibo, Zhou Ruoqi.Comprehensive appraisal method to green residence and its design criteria [M].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2006.(in Chinese)
[11] Pacione M.The use of objective and subjective measures of life quality in human geography [J].Progress in Human Geography, 1982, 6:495-514.
[12] Liu Qibo, Zhou Ruoqi.Applying improvable topsis method in green building’s synthetical assessment [J].Optimization of Capital Construction, 2001, 22(5):30-32.(in Chinese)
[13] GBT05.2005 International initiative for a sustainable built environment(iiSBE)[S/OL].(2005-01-27)[2007-09-20].http//www.iisbe.org/iisbe/gbc2k5/gbc2k5-start.html.

Memo

Memo:

Biographies: Li Sui(1977—), male, graduate, lecturer;Shi Tiemao(corresponding author), male, professor, tiemaos@sjzu.edu.cn.
Foundation items: The National Key Technology R& D Program during the 11th Five-Year Plan(No.2006BAJ11B04-2), the Soft Science Project of the Ministry of Construction of China(No.2008-R2-25).
Citation: Li Sui, Shi Tiemao, Zhou Le.Scales, methods and technical analysis of China’s residential environment evaluation[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2009, 25(2):274-277.

Common functions