|Table of Contents|

[1] Liu Zhiwei, Deng Wei, Ji Yanjie,. Influence of land use characteristics and trip attributeson commuting mode choice: a case of Nanjing [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2014, 30 (1): 107-112. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2014.01.020]
Copy

Influence of land use characteristics and trip attributeson commuting mode choice: a case of Nanjing()
土地利用特征与出行属性对交通方式选择的影响: 以南京主城区为例
Share:

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:
30
Issue:
2014 1
Page:
107-112
Research Field:
Traffic and Transportation Engineering
Publishing date:
2014-03-31

Info

Title:
Influence of land use characteristics and trip attributeson commuting mode choice: a case of Nanjing
土地利用特征与出行属性对交通方式选择的影响: 以南京主城区为例
Author(s):
Liu Zhiwei Deng Wei Ji Yanjie
School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
刘志伟 邓卫 季彦婕
东南大学交通学院, 南京210096
Keywords:
traffic engineering land use travel mode choice nested logit model elasticity analysis
交通工程 土地利用 出行方式选择 分层logit模型 弹性分析
PACS:
U121
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2014.01.020
Abstract:
The effects of socio-demographics, land use characteristics and trip attributes on the commute mode choice are studied with a nested logit(NL)model. Based on the random utility maximum theory, the NL model is formulated. The analysis is carried out in the main area of Nanjing. Direct and cross elasticities are calculated to analyze the effects of travel time and travel cost on the selection of travel mode choice. The results reveal that the non-motorized travel modes are more attractive in the areas with higher housing and employment accessibility and car owners are found to be more likely to commute to work by car. The bus and subway choice probabilities are more sensitive to changes in travel times than to changes in travel costs. In conclusion, a comprehensive public transit system and effective integration of land use and transportation policies help to relieve the traffic congestion levels caused by the increasing urban sprawl.
以南京市主城区为例, 基于随机效用最大化理论, 建立了居民的出行方式选择分层logit模型.研究了个人社会经济属性、城市土地利用特征以及出行属性等因素对居民出行方式选择的影响.同时, 通过计算出行时间与出行费用的直接弹性和交叉弹性分析它们对出行方式选择的敏感程度.研究结果表明:非机动化的出行方式在居住可达性和就业可达性高的区域更加具有吸引力, 小汽车拥有者更加偏向于选择小汽车出行;相对出行费用而言, 选择公交与地铁的居民对出行时间更加敏感;完善的公共交通系统以及城市土地利用与交通政策的有效结合有助于缓解由于城市的不断扩张引起的交通拥堵水平.

References:

[1] Handy S, Niemeier D. Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives [J]. Environ Planning A, 1997, 29(7): 1175-1194.
[2] Boarnet M G, Sarmiento S. Can land-use policy really affect travel behavior? A study of the link between non-work travel and land-use characteristics [J]. Urban Studies, 1998, 35(7): 1155-1169.
[3] Macfadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
[4] Wen C H, Koppelman F S. The generalized nested logit model [J]. Transportation, 2001, 35(7): 627-641.
[5] Yang L Y, Zheng G, Zhu X N. Cross-nested logit model for the joint choice of residential location, travel mode, and departure time [J]. Habitat International, 2013, 38(4): 157-166.
[6] Guadagni P M, Little J D C. When and what to buy: a nested logit model of coffee purchase [J]. Journal of Forecasting, 1998, 17(3): 303-326.
[7] Ortúzar D J. On the development of the nested logit model [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2001, 35(2): 213-216.
[8] Ben-Akiva M E. Structure of passenger travel demand models [D]. Cambridge, MA, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1973.
[9] Ben-Akiva M E. Structure of passenger travel demand models [J]. Transportation Research Record, 1974, 526: 26-42.
[10] Sultana S. Effects of married-couple dual-earner households on metropolitan commuting: evidence from the Atlanta metropolitan area [J]. Urban Geography, 2005, 26(4): 328-352.
[11] Limtanakool N, Dijst M, Schwanen A T. The influence of socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel time consideration on mode choice for medium-and longer-distance trips [J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2006, 14(5): 327-341.
[12] Cao X, Mokhtarian P, Handy A S. Cross-sectional and quasi-panel explorations of the connection between the built environment and auto ownership [J]. Environment and Planning A, 2007, 39(4): 830-847.
[13] Peng Z. The jobs-housing balance and urban commuting [J]. Urban Studies, 1997, 34(8): 1215-1235.
[14] Litman T. Evaluating accessibility for transportation planning [R]. Victoria, Canada:Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2008.
[15] Cervero R, Duncan M. Transit’s added value [J]. Urban Land, 2002, 1805(2): 77-84.
[16] Des Rosiers F, Thériault M, Villeneuve P. Sorting out access and neighbourhood factors in hedonic price modelling [J]. The Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 2000, 18(3): 291-315.
[17] Bierlaire M. Biogeme: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models [C]//3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference. Ascona, Switzerland, 2003:1-24.

Memo

Memo:
Biographies: Liu Zhiwei(1987—), male, graduate; Deng Wei(corresponding author), male, doctor, professor, dengwei@seu.edu.cn.
Foundation item: The National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.50908051).
Citation: Liu Zhiwei, Deng Wei, Ji Yanjie. Influence of land use characteristics and trip attributes on commuting mode choice: a case of Nanjing[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2014, 30(1):107-112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2014.01.020]
Last Update: 2014-03-20