[1] Zhang Tianpeng, Liu Tielin, Yang Jun, et al. Concept and evaluation method of equipmentsystem of systems contribution rate [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2021, 37 (3): 317-324. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.03.012]
Copy
Concept and evaluation method of equipmentsystem of systems contribution rate(
)
装备体系贡献率概念及评估方法
)Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]
- Volumn:
- 37
- Issue:
- 2021 3
- Page:
- 317-324
- Research Field:
- Publishing date:
- 2021-09-20
Info
- Title:
- Concept and evaluation method of equipmentsystem of systems contribution rate
- 装备体系贡献率概念及评估方法
- Author(s):
- Zhang Tianpeng1; 2; Liu Tielin1; Yang Jun2
-
1Shijiazhuang Campus, Army Engineering University, Shijiazhuang 050003, China
2The 32107 Army of the PLA, Aershan 137805, China
- Keywords:
- system of systems(SoS)contribution rate; structural equation mode; equipment SoS capability assessment; evaluation indicator framework
- PACS:
- E917
- DOI:
- 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.03.012
- Abstract:
- To scientifically evaluate the equipment system of systems(SoS)contribution rate, a contribution rate calculation method based on a structural equation model(SEM)is proposed in this paper. The connotation and evaluation process of the equipment SoS contribution rate were redefined and standardized. To solve the existing problems in the application of the original contribution rate formula, a modified contribution rate calculation formula is proposed. Finally, the contribution rate evaluation index was divided into latent and explicit variables. The measurement and structural equations in the SEM were used to calculate and analyze the latent variables. The simulation results show that the number of defense lines of air defense weapon equipment has a greater impact on the linear configuration than the group configuration. When the number of K-type air defense weapons is sufficient, the two-layer linear configuration should be adopted with 20 air defense weapon systems. When the number of K-type air defense weapons is insufficient, the single-layer group configuration should be adopted with 12 air defense weapon systems.
- 为科学评价装备体系贡献率, 提出了一种基于结构方程模型的贡献率计算方法.首先, 对装备体系贡献率的内涵和评估过程进行了重新定义;然后, 为了解决原贡献率公式应用中存在的问题, 提出了修正的贡献率计算公式;最后, 将贡献率评估指标分为潜变量和显变量, 利用结构方程模型中的测量方程和结构方程实现对潜变量的计算与分析.仿真结果表明:防空武器装备的防线数对线性配置的影响大于集团配置, 在K型防空武器装备数量足够的情况下, 应采用2层线性配置, 防空武器数量选为20套;当K型防空武器装备数量不足时, 应采用单层群配置, 防空武器数量选为12套.
References:
[1] Wan C, Xiong W, Ye Y, et al. Research on development strategy of weapon equipment in antagonistic environment[C]// The 11th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference. Beijing, China, 2017:221-225.DOI: 10.1109/SYSCON.2017.7934732.
[2] Daˇ/gdeviren M, Yavuz S, K�131;l�131;n�E7; N. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(4):8143-8151. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008. 10.016.
[3] Li D, Hu X. Redundant and fault-tolerant algorithms for real-time measurement and control systems for weapon equipment[J]. ISA Transactions, 2017, 67:398. DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2017.01.005.
[4] Wang M. An integrated analysis and modeling framework for weapon equipment system evolution[C]// The 6th International Symposium on Project Management. Wuhan, China, 2018: 598-606. DOI: DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2017.01.004.
[5] Chi Y, Li J C, Yang K W, et al. An equipment offering degree evaluation method for weapon system-of-systems combat network based on operation loop[J]. Atlantis Press, 2016, 2(1):477-488. DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6239-180-2_46
[6] Jia Z, Ding L S, Zhou Y F. Ieee. Process design of a capability-based weapon equipment requirements analysis system[C]// The Fifth International Conference on Software Defined Systems. Shanghai, China, 2018: 74-79. DOI:10.2991/978-94-6239-180-2 _68.
[7] Wang M, Zhang H Q, Zhang K. A model and solving algorithm of combination planning for weapon equipment based on epochera analysis method[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2017, 1890(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1063/1.5005319.
[8] Li X, Lü B, Jiang Y. Research on civil-military integration degree of weapon equipment research and production by system dynamics model[C]// The 29th Chinese Control and Decision Conference. Chongqing, China, 2017: 2403-2406. DOI:10.1109/ CCDC.2017.7978917.
[9] Pei D, Qin D G. Evaluation of contribution rate of weapon equipment system of systems capability based on conditional evidential network[C]// The 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science. Beijing, China, 2017: 459-463. DOI: 10.1109/ICSESS.2017.8342955.
[10] Li X S, Lü B. Research on weapon equipment civil-military integration development mode based on Fuzzy Petri Net[C]// The 36th Chinese Control Conference. Dalian, China, 2017:10398-10402. DOI: 10.23919/ChiCC.2017.8029011.
[11] Qu Q, He X H, Zhang W C. Analysis of operational effectiveness index of army weapon equipment system[C]// International Conference on Computer Science and Technology. Guangzhou, China, 2017: 100-106. DOI: 10.23919/ChiCC.2017.8598431.
Memo
- Memo:
-
Biographies: Zhang Tianpeng(1986—), male, doctor; Liu Tielin(corresponding author), male, doctor, professor, 2810758689@qq.com.
Foundation item: The National Social Science Foundation Military Science Project(No.16GJ003-068).
Citation: Zhang Tianpeng, Liu Tielin, Yang Jun.Concept and evaluation method of equipment system of systems contribution rate[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2021, 37(3):317-324.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.03.012.