[1] Chun Qing, Meng Zhe, Hua Yiwei, et al. Aseismic strengthening techniques of Chinese typical stele relics:A case study of Xi’an Beilin [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2018, 34 (3): 323-330. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2018.03.007]

Copy

Aseismic strengthening techniques of Chinese typical stele relics:A case study of Xi’an Beilin()

传统石碑文物的抗震加固技术研究——以西安碑林石碑为例

Share：

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:

34

Issue:

2018 3

Page:

323-330

Research Field:

Civil Engineering

Publishing date:

2018-09-20

Info

Title:

Aseismic strengthening techniques of Chinese typical stele relics:A case study of Xi’an Beilin

传统石碑文物的抗震加固技术研究——以西安碑林石碑为例

Author(s):

Chun Qing¹;  2;  Meng Zhe¹;  Hua Yiwei¹

¹School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
²Key Laboratory of Urban and Architectural Heritage Conservation, Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

淳庆¹;  2;  孟哲¹;  华一唯¹

¹东南大学建筑学院, 南京 210096; ²东南大学城市与建筑遗产保护教育部重点实验室, 南京 210096

Keywords:

stele relics;  aseismic strengthening;  stainless angle steel;  base isolation;  finite element method

石碑文物;  抗震加固;  不锈钢箍;  基础隔震;  有限元分析

PACS:

TU375

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2018.03.007

Abstract:

In order to improve the seismic performance of Chinese traditional stele relics, a suitable aseismic strengthening method of Chinese traditional stele relics is proposed. Taking the typical stele relic in Xi’an Beilin as an example, the on-site investigations were carried out to obtain the actual geometric size and damage state of the stele relic. Then, the structural performance of the stele relic was analyzed by the finite element software ANSYS. Finally, the two different aseismic strengthening methods of the traditional stele relic are proposed and comparatively analyzed. The results show that in addition to the common problems, such as weathering, and cracks, etc, earthquakes seriously threaten the structural safety of stele relics. Under the rarely-occurring earthquake of eight degree, the unstrengthened stele relic will be overturned, and many cracks will occur at the connection area of stele body and stele pedestal. When the stele relic is strengthened by the stainless angle steel strengthening method, the stele relic will not be overturned, but some cracks will occur at the connection area of stele body and stele pedestal. When the stele relic is strengthened by the base isolation strengthening method, the stele relic will not be overturned, and no cracks will occur at the connection area of stele body and stele pedestal. Therefore, the aseismic strengthening effect of the base isolation strengthening method is obviously better than that of the stainless angle steel strengthening method, and this method is a suitable aseismic strengthening method of Chinese traditional stele relics.

为提升传统石碑文物的抗震性能, 提出适合石碑文物的抗震加固方法.以西安碑林中的典型石碑文物为例, 首先对石碑文物的保存现状进行了详细勘测, 然后采用ANSYS有限元分析软件对石碑文物进行结构性能的分析, 最后提出2种适合该类型文物的抗震加固方法并进行对比分析.结果表明:这些石碑文物不仅存在不同程度的风化、裂缝等明显残损问题, 还存在地震时的结构安全问题.在8度罕遇地震作用下, 未加固的石碑文物碑身和碑座处会出现许多裂缝, 且石碑会整体倾覆.当采用增设不锈钢箍加固法对其进行抗震加固后, 石碑整体不会倾覆, 但石碑碑身和碑座处仍会出现一些裂缝.当采用基础隔震法对其进行抗震加固后, 石碑整体不会倾覆, 且石碑碑身和碑座处不会出现裂缝.因此, 基础隔震法对传统石碑的抗震加固效果更好, 可作为石碑文物的抗震加固方法.

References:

[1] Vasanelli E, Colangiuli D, Calia A, et al.Ultrasonic pulse velocity for the evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of a highly porous building limestone[J]. Ultrasonics, 2015, 60:33-40. DOI:10.1016/j.ultras.2015.02.010.
[2] Vasconcelos G, Louren O P B, Alves C A S, et al. Ultrasonic evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of granites[J]. Ultrasonics, 2008, 48(5): 453-466. DOI:10.1016/j.ultras.2008.03.008.
[3] Meng T H, Du R Q, Hou Z, et al.The spectra-based SVM prediction model for Yungang Grottoes samples[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2015, 55: 280-285. DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2015.01.012.
[4] El-Gohary M A. Methodological evaluation of some consolidants interference with ancient Egyptian sandstone “Edfu Mammisi as a case study”[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2015, 80: 87-97. DOI:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.11.021.
[5] Sassoni E, Naidu S, Scherer G W. The use of hydroxyapatite as a new inorganic consolidant for damaged carbonate stones[J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2011, 12(4): 346-355. DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2011.02.005.
[6] Tesser E, Antonelli F, Sperni L, et al.Study of the stability of siloxane stone strengthening agents[J]. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2014, 110: 232-240. DOI:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.08.022.
[7] Lignola G P, Nigro E, Cosenza E. Seismic vulnerability of natural stone pinnacles on the Amalfi Coast in Italy[J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2010, 11(1): 68-80. DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2009.04.002.
[8] Aktaş Y D, Turer A. Seismic evaluation and strengthening of nemrut monuments[J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2015, 16(3): 381-385. DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2014.06.009.
[9] Park H D, Shin G H.Geotechnical and geological properties of Mokattam limestones: Implications for conservation strategies for ancient Egyptian stone monuments[J]. Engineering Geology, 2009, 104(3/4):190-199. DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.10.009.
[10] Yao Y. The experimental research of ultrasonic method in detecting the disease of stone relics[D]. Beijing: School of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences, 2011.(in Chinese)
[11] Zhang L Q. Study to seismic mitigation and isolation techniques of floating stone relics[J]. Special Structures, 2014, 31(5): 16-20.(in Chinese)
[12] Chun Q, Pan J W. Structural performance analysis and conservation study of the imperial stelae in Jinling Dabaoen Temple [J]. Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology, 2015, 27(1): 1-6. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-1538.2015.01.001. (in Chinese)
[13] State Cultural Relics Bureau of China. WW/T0002—2007 Disease classification and graphic of the ancient stone objects[S]. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 2008.(in Chinese)
[14] Zhou T, Li A Q. Development and verification of element model for lead-rubber bearings[J].Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 47(6):1154-1160.(in Chinese)
[15] Chen P, Zhao D, Zhang W X, et al. Conservation, strengthening and installation of huangsong stele [J]. Construction Technology, 2006, 35(8): 39-40.(in Chinese)
[16] Lin D Y. Maintenance construction technology of Bixi Stele in Gulongzhong[J]. Traditional Chinese Architecture and Gardens, 1990, 4(8): 47-48.(in Chinese)
[17] Wang F. Conservation of the stone inscriptions in Tai Qing Palace[J]. China Cultural Heritage Scientific Research, 2013, 4(2): 73-76.(in Chinese)
[18] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of People’s Republic of China. GB 20688.3—2006 Rubber bearings—Part 3: Elastomeric seismic-protection isolators for buildings[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2007.(in Chinese)

Memo

Memo:

Biography: Chun Qing(1979—), male, doctor, associate professor, cqnj1979@163.com.
Foundation items: The National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.51578127, 51778122), the Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China(No.201452), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(No.2242016K41065).
Citation: Chun Qing, Meng Zhe, Hua Yiwei. Aseismic strengthening techniques of Chinese typical stele relics: A case study of Xi’an Beilin[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2018, 34(3):323-330.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2018.03.007.

Common functions