|Table of Contents|

[1] Chen Yuexia, Zha Qifen, Jing Peng, Cheng Hengquan, et al. Modeling and gender difference analysis of acceptanceof autonomous driving technology [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2021, 37 (2): 216-221. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.02.012]
Copy

Modeling and gender difference analysis of acceptanceof autonomous driving technology()
自动驾驶技术接受度建模与性别差异性分析
Share：

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:
37
Issue:
2021 2
Page:
216-221
Research Field:
Traffic and Transportation Engineering
Publishing date:
2021-06-20

Info

Title:
Modeling and gender difference analysis of acceptanceof autonomous driving technology
自动驾驶技术接受度建模与性别差异性分析
Author(s):
Chen Yuexia1;  Zha Qifen2;  Jing Peng1;  Cheng Hengquan1;  Shao Danning1
1School of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
陈月霞1;  查奇芬2;  景鹏1;  程恒权1;  邵丹宁1
1 江苏大学汽车与交通工程学院, 镇江 212013; 2 江苏大学财经学院, 镇江 212013
Keywords:
autonomous vehicle;  acceptance of autonomous driving technology;  technology acceptance model;  theory of planned behavior;  multiple indicators and multiple causes model
自动驾驶汽车;  自动驾驶技术接受度;  技术接受模型;  计划行为理论;  多指标多因素模型
PACS:
U491.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.02.012
Abstract:
In order to deeply analyze the differences in the acceptance of autonomous driving technology among different gender groups, a multiple indicators and multiple causes model was constructed by integrating a technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior to comprehensively reveal the gender differences in the influence mechanisms of subjective and objective factors. The analysis is based on data collected from Chinese urban residents. Among objective factors, age has a significant negative impact on women’s perceived behavior control and a significant positive impact on perceived ease of use. Education has a significant positive impact on men’s perceived behavior control, and has a strong positive impact on women’s perceived usefulness(PU). For men, income and education are found to have strong positive impacts on perceived behavior control. Among subjective factors, perceived ease of use(PEU)has the greatest influence on women’s behavior intention, and it is the only influential factor for women’s intention to use autonomous driving technology, with an influence coefficient of 0.72. The influencing path of men’s intention to use autonomous driving technology is more complex. It is not only directly affected by the significant and positive joint effects of attitude and PU, but also indirectly affected by perceived behavior controls, subjective norms, and PEU.
为深度解析性别异质群体对于自动驾驶技术的接受差异, 融合技术接受模型和计划行为理论构建两性自动驾驶技术接受度多指标多因素模型, 全面揭示主、客观因素作用下自动驾驶技术接受度影响机制的性别差异性.以中国城市居民为例, 分析结果表明:不同性别群组中主、客观因素对自动驾驶技术接受度的影响机制存在差异.客观因素方面, 年龄对女性的感知行为控制有显著负向影响, 而对其感知易用性存在显著正向影响;月收入对男性的感知行为控制有显著性正向影响;受教育程度对男性的感知行为控制有显著正向影响, 对女性的感知有用性有显著正向影响.主观因素方面, 感知易用性对女性行为意向的影响作用最大, 影响系数达到0.72, 也是女性自动驾驶技术行为意向最显著且唯一的影响因素, 而男性的行为意向影响路径较为复杂, 不仅受到态度和感知有用性的显著正向联合作用, 而且受到感知行为控制、主观规范和感知易用性的间接影响.

References:

[1] Zhang T R, Tao D, Qu X D, et, al. The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles[J].Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019, 98: 207-220. DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018.
[2] Perrine K A, Kockelman K M, Huang Y T. Anticipating long-distance travel shifts due to self-driving vehicles[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 82: 102547. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102547.
[3] Tang L, Qing S D, Xu Z G, et al. Research review on public acceptance of autonomous driving[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(2):131-146.(in Chinese)
[4] Jing P, Xu G, Chen Y X, et al. The determinants behind the acceptance of autonomous vehicles: A systematic review[J].Sustainability, 2020, 12(5): 1-26. DOI:10.3390/su12051719.
[5] Yuen K F, Wong Y D, Ma F, et al. The determinants of public acceptance of autonomous vehicles: An innovation diffusion perspective[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 270: 121904. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121904.
[6] Etzioni S, Hamadneh J, Elvarsson A B, et al. Modeling cross-national differences in automated vehicle acceptance[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(22): 1-22. DOI:10.3390/su12229765.
[7] Hohenberger C, Sp�F6;rrle M, Welpe I M. How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016, 94: 374-385. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.022.
[8] Kyriakidis M, Happee R, de Winter J C F. Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2015, 32: 127-140. DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014.
[9] Liu P, Zhang Y W, He Z. The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2019, 185: 341-347. DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2019.01.003.
[10] Payre W, Cestac J, Delhomme P. Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014, 27: 252-263. DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009.
[11] Chen C F, Chao W H. Habitual or reasoned? Using the theory of planned behavior, technology acceptance model, and habit to examine switching intentions toward public transit[J].Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2011, 14(2): 128-137. DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2010.11.006.
[12] Huang W. Research on the acceptance of fully autonomous vehicle based on theory of planned behavior and technology acceptance model[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2019.(in Chinese)
[13] Wang S Y, Fan J, Zhao D T, et al. Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: Using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model[J].Transportation, 2016, 43(1): 123-143. DOI:10.1007/s11116-014-9567-9.
[14] Jing P, Huang H, Ran B, et al. Exploring the factors affecting mode choice intention of autonomous vehicle based on an extended theory of planned behavior—a case study in China[J].Sustainability, 2019, 11(4): 1-20. DOI:10.3390/su11041155.
[15] Chen Y X, Chen L, Zha Q F, et al. A travel mode forecasting model based on low-carbon psychological latent variable logit model[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 34(9): 100-108, 137. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2017.09.014. (in Chinese)
[16] Qu W N, Sun H L, Ge Y. The effects of trait anxiety and the big five personality traits on self-driving car acceptance[J].Transportation, 2020: 1-17. DOI:10.1007/s11116-020-10143-7.
[17] Chen Y X, Chen L, Zha Q F, et al. Forecasting model of travel mode based on latent variable SVM[J]. Jonrnal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 46(6):1313-1317. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2016.06.034. (in Chinese)

Memo

Memo:
Biography: Chen Yuexia(1982—), male, doctor, lecturer, chenyxia@ujs.edu.cn.
Foundation items: The National Key Research and Development Program of China(No. 2018YFB1601304), the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 71871107), Philosophy and Social Science Foundation Project of Universities in Jiangsu Province(No. 2020SJA2059).
Citation: Chen Yuexia, Zha Qifen, Jing Peng, et al. Modeling and gender difference analysis of acceptance of autonomous driving technology[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2021, 37(2):216-221.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.02.012.
Last Update: 2021-06-20