[1] Zhang Tianpeng, Liu Tielin, Yang Jun, et al. Concept and evaluation method of equipmentsystem of systems contribution rate [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2021, 37 (3): 317-324. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.03.012]

Copy

Concept and evaluation method of equipmentsystem of systems contribution rate()

Share：

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:

37

Issue:

2021 3

Page:

317-324

Research Field:

Publishing date:

2021-09-20

Info

Title:

Concept and evaluation method of equipmentsystem of systems contribution rate

Author(s):

Zhang Tianpeng¹;  2;  Liu Tielin¹;  Yang Jun²

¹Shijiazhuang Campus, Army Engineering University, Shijiazhuang 050003, China
²The 32107 Army of the PLA, Aershan 137805, China

Keywords:

system of systems(SoS)contribution rate;  structural equation mode;  equipment SoS capability assessment;  evaluation indicator framework

PACS:

E917

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.03.012

Abstract:

To scientifically evaluate the equipment system of systems(SoS)contribution rate, a contribution rate calculation method based on a structural equation model(SEM)is proposed in this paper. The connotation and evaluation process of the equipment SoS contribution rate were redefined and standardized. To solve the existing problems in the application of the original contribution rate formula, a modified contribution rate calculation formula is proposed. Finally, the contribution rate evaluation index was divided into latent and explicit variables. The measurement and structural equations in the SEM were used to calculate and analyze the latent variables. The simulation results show that the number of defense lines of air defense weapon equipment has a greater impact on the linear configuration than the group configuration. When the number of K-type air defense weapons is sufficient, the two-layer linear configuration should be adopted with 20 air defense weapon systems. When the number of K-type air defense weapons is insufficient, the single-layer group configuration should be adopted with 12 air defense weapon systems.

References:

[1] Wan C, Xiong W, Ye Y, et al. Research on development strategy of weapon equipment in antagonistic environment[C]// The 11th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference. Beijing, China, 2017:221-225.DOI: 10.1109/SYSCON.2017.7934732.
[2] Daˇ/gdeviren M, Yavuz S, K�131;l�131;n�E7; N. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(4):8143-8151. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008. 10.016.
[3] Li D, Hu X. Redundant and fault-tolerant algorithms for real-time measurement and control systems for weapon equipment[J]. ISA Transactions, 2017, 67:398. DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2017.01.005.
[4] Wang M. An integrated analysis and modeling framework for weapon equipment system evolution[C]// The 6th International Symposium on Project Management. Wuhan, China, 2018: 598-606. DOI: DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2017.01.004.
[5] Chi Y, Li J C, Yang K W, et al. An equipment offering degree evaluation method for weapon system-of-systems combat network based on operation loop[J]. Atlantis Press, 2016, 2(1):477-488. DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6239-180-2_46
[6] Jia Z, Ding L S, Zhou Y F. Ieee. Process design of a capability-based weapon equipment requirements analysis system[C]// The Fifth International Conference on Software Defined Systems. Shanghai, China, 2018: 74-79. DOI:10.2991/978-94-6239-180-2 _68.
[7] Wang M, Zhang H Q, Zhang K. A model and solving algorithm of combination planning for weapon equipment based on epochera analysis method[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2017, 1890(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1063/1.5005319.
[8] Li X, Lü B, Jiang Y. Research on civil-military integration degree of weapon equipment research and production by system dynamics model[C]// The 29th Chinese Control and Decision Conference. Chongqing, China, 2017: 2403-2406. DOI:10.1109/ CCDC.2017.7978917.
[9] Pei D, Qin D G. Evaluation of contribution rate of weapon equipment system of systems capability based on conditional evidential network[C]// The 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science. Beijing, China, 2017: 459-463. DOI: 10.1109/ICSESS.2017.8342955.
[10] Li X S, Lü B. Research on weapon equipment civil-military integration development mode based on Fuzzy Petri Net[C]// The 36th Chinese Control Conference. Dalian, China, 2017:10398-10402. DOI: 10.23919/ChiCC.2017.8029011.
[11] Qu Q, He X H, Zhang W C. Analysis of operational effectiveness index of army weapon equipment system[C]// International Conference on Computer Science and Technology. Guangzhou, China, 2017: 100-106. DOI: 10.23919/ChiCC.2017.8598431.

Memo

Memo:

Biographies: Zhang Tianpeng(1986—), male, doctor; Liu Tielin(corresponding author), male, doctor, professor, 2810758689@qq.com.
Foundation item: The National Social Science Foundation Military Science Project(No.16GJ003-068).
Citation: Zhang Tianpeng, Liu Tielin, Yang Jun.Concept and evaluation method of equipment system of systems contribution rate[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2021, 37(3):317-324.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.03.012.

Common functions