|Table of Contents|

[1] XU Pengyu, ZHAO Lindu,. Analysis of health insurance reform strategies from a risk‑sharing perspective based on the Markov model [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2025, 41 (1): 118-126. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2025.01.015]
Copy

Analysis of health insurance reform strategies from a risk‑sharing perspective based on the Markov model()
风险共担视角下医保制度改革策略分析——基于马尔可夫模型
Share:

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:
41
Issue:
2025 1
Page:
118-126
Research Field:
Economy and Management
Publishing date:
2025-03-07

Info

Title:
Analysis of health insurance reform strategies from a risk‑sharing perspective based on the Markov model
风险共担视角下医保制度改革策略分析——基于马尔可夫模型
Author(s):
XU Pengyu ZHAO Lindu
School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
徐鹏宇 赵林度
东南大学经济管理学院,南京 211189
Keywords:
equal coverage for the same disease (ECSD) individualized out‑of‑pocket (I‑OOP) health insurance reform risk sharing Markov model
同病同保障差异化自付医保改革风险共担马尔科夫模型
PACS:
C913.7;F842.684;R197.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2025.01.015
Abstract:
China’s healthcare system faces increasing challenges, including surging medical costs, resource allocation imbalances favoring large hospitals, and ineffective referral mechanisms. The lack of a unified strategy integrating standardized coverage with personalized payment compounds these issues. To this end, this study proposes a risk‑sharing reform strategy that combines equal coverage for the same disease (ECSD) with an individualized out‑of‑pocket (I‑OOP) model. Specifically, the study employs a Markov model to capture patient transitions across health states and care levels. The findings show that ECSD and I‑OOP enhance equity by standardizing disease coverage while tailoring costs to patient income and facility type. This approach alleviates demand on high‑tier hospitals, promoting primary care utilization and enabling balanced resource distribution. The study’s findings provide a reference for policymakers and healthcare administrators by presenting a scalable framework that is aligned with China’s development goals with the aim of fostering an efficient, sustainable healthcare system that is adaptable to regional needs.
中国的医疗体系面临着不断升级的挑战,包括医疗费用激增、资源分配失衡、偏向大医院以及转诊机制失效,由于缺乏将标准化保障与个性化支付相结合的统一战略,这些问题变得更加复杂。本研究提出了一种将同病同保障(ECSD)与差异化自付(I‑OOP)模式相结合的风险共担医保改革策略。采用马尔可夫模型捕捉病人在不同健康状态和护理级别之间的转变。研究结果表明,同病同保障和差异化自付模式通过标准化疾病覆盖范围来提高公平性,同时根据患者收入和医疗机构类型调整费用成本。该方法减轻了大医院的需求压力,促进了基层卫生服务利用率,并实现了更均衡的资源分配。该研究提出了一个与中国发展目标相一致的可扩展框架,为政策制定者和医疗管理者提供了参考,以促进建立一个适应区域需求的高效、可持续的医疗体系。

References:

[1]ZHAO J Y, GUO K. Study on the influencing factors of Chinese medical insurance fund development: Based on provincial panel data[J]. Management Review, 2023, 35(8): 71‑84. (in Chinese)
[2]WANG Z, ZHU F M. Calculation of the income and expenditure of the fund for the reform of the medical insurance outpatient security mode[J]. China Health Insurance, 2020(11): 41‑48. (in Chinese)
[3]Health Ministry of People’s Republic of China. China health statistics yearbook[M]. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press, 2011: 118. (in Chinese)
[4]National Health and Family Planning Commission. China health and family planning statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press, 2016: 122. (in Chinese)
[5]National Health Commission. China health statistics yearbook[M]. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press, 2022: 126. (in Chinese)
[6]GAO X T, HAO X Q. Willingness of Chinese patients for downward referral and its influencing factors: A meta analysis[J]. Modern Hospitals, 2022, 22(5): 671‑675. (in Chinese)
[7]WEI J T, GE M Y, LIU Z L, et al. Current situation and analysis of the two‑way referral system in Luohe based on the mode of health alliance[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(4): 635‑638. (in Chinese)
[8]GONG G W. Value‑based orientation study on the formation mechanism of saving in the global budget of medical insurance in county medical community[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)
[9]LÜ S N, FENG J. Effect of the policy for cross‑provincial direct settlement of outpatient expenses on basic medical insurance expenditure[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 517(7): 97‑115. (in Chinese)
[10]SUN J, FU X Z, YAO Q. Burden of hospitalization and countermeasures for chronic diseases in megacities from the perspective of medical insurance: A case study of W city in Central China[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 2023, 16(4): 1‑8. (in Chinese)
[11]FENG J, CHEN X X, HU B. The medical insurance based on efficiency and equity: evidence from the integration of the national basic medical insurance program for urban and rural residents[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2022, 57(6): 154‑172. (in Chinese)
[12]ZHENG G C. Comprehensively deepening health care reforms: Progress, challenges and advancement[J]. Administration Reform, 2021, 10(10): 12‑25. (in Chinese)
[13]QIN Y F. DRG disease payment system reform: “Same price for same disease” to alleviate “expensive medical treatment”[EB/OL]. (2018‑04‑18) [2024‑06‑01]. https://www.zgylbx.com/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=17&id=32989.(in Chinese)
[14]China Medical Insurance. DIP reform reinforces policy synergies and can be informed by these experiences[EB/OL]. (2024‑03‑01) [2024‑06‑01]. http://www.drugnet.com.cn/news/detail/221528.(in Chinese)
[15]SONNENBERG F A, BECK J R. Markov models in medical decision making: A practical guide[J]. Medical Decision Making, 1993, 13(4): 322‑338.
[16]LIU G E. China pharmacoeconomic evaluation guide 2020[M]. Beijing: Market Press, 2020: 8‑10. (in Chinese)
[17]SUN H, WANG H Y. Enhancing customers’ prevention efforts: An incentive feedback mechanism design[J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2021, 37(4): 436‑444.
[18]GONG X, ZHAO L D. Return models of health data platform considering online‑and‑offline interaction[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 52(1): 196‑202. (in Chinese)
[19]GUO W, ZHONG Y M, ZHOU B. Economic operation of Chinese pharmaceutical industry from January to September 2019[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmaceuticals, 2019, 50(12): 1530‑1536. (in Chinese)
[20]BELLMAN R, DREYFUS S E. Applied dynamic programming[M]. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1962: 13‑14.
[21]SUTTON R S, BARTO A G. Reinforcement learning: An introduction[M]. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2014: 73‑88.
[22]PUTERMAN M L. Markov decision processes: Discrete stochastic dynamic programming[M]. Danvers, MA, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1994: 25‑50.
[23]NASH J F. Equilibrium points in N‑person games[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1950, 36(1): 48‑49.
[24]LIANG Y X, ZHAO L D. Sustainability of health information exchange platform based on information cooperation[J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2021, 37(3): 332‑338.
[25]SHI S Y, ZHAO H Y, LIU Z K, et al. Application of multi‑state Markov model in studying transition of number of chronic complications and influencing factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, 2021, 42(7): 1274‑1279. (in Chinese)
[26]FUDENBERG D, TIROLE J. Game theory[M]. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1991: 105‑107.
[27]Anhui Medical Insurance Bureau. Notice on the issuance of Anhui Province basic medical insurance payment for diseases according to disease grouping and medical insurance payment standards (first batch) [EB/OL]. (2019‑11‑20) [2024‑06‑01]. https://ybj.ah.gov.cn/public/7071/117236261.html.(in Chinese)
[28]Fuyang Medical Insurance Bureau. Our city is trying to implement the same insurance for the same disease to effectively alleviate the “expensive medical treatment”[EB/OL]. (2020‑08‑06) [2024‑06‑01]. https://www.fy.gov.cn/content/detail/5f2ba3227f8b9a29168b4585.html.(in Chinese)
[29]Xuancheng Municipal Health Commission. Reply to the municipal CPPCC proposal No. 167 in 2021[EB/OL]. (2021‑08‑24) [2024‑06‑01]. https://www.xuancheng.gov.cn/OpennessContent/show/2207148.html.(in Chinese)
[30]XU Z L, WENG Z X, ZHUO C. Experiences and introduction of C‑DRG collection and payment reform in Sanming[J]. Chinese Health Economics, 2022, 41(1): 28‑31. (in Chinese)
[31]CHEN X J, HUA L, LIU H L. Difficulties and countermeasures of C‑DRG implementation in Sanming[J]. Chinese Health Economics, 2022, 41(1): 36‑40. (in Chinese)
[32]ZHANG Y M. Sanming medical reform and C‑DRG payment system reform [EB/OL]. (2021‑11‑09) [2024‑06‑01]. https://www.cn‑healthcare.com/articlewm/20211109/content‑1282943.html.(in Chinese)
[33]PAN S F, WANG H Y, LIN X X. Effects of medical insurance payment on preventive efforts of patients with chronic diseases and hospitals[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 50(4): 789‑796. (in Chinese)
[34]WANG K, XIAO Y T, ZHAO L D. Value on investment decision for internet hospitals under online /offline direct‑to‑patient mode[J]. Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2023, 39(1): 98‑106.

Memo

Memo:
Received 2024-09-06,Revised 2024-11-22.
Biographies: Xu Pengyu (1994—), male, Ph.D. candidate;Zhao Lindu (corresponding author), male, doctor, professor, ldzhao@seu.edu.cn.
Foundation item:The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72071042).
Citation:XU Pengyu,ZHAO Lindu.Analysis of health insurance reform strategies from a risk-sharing perspective based on the Markov model [J].Journal of Southeast University (English Edition),2025,41(1):118-126.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2025.01.015.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2025.01.015
Last Update: 2025-03-20