|Table of Contents|

[1] Hua Jia, Zhang Linsheng, Pan Yanli, Li Yuezhong, et al. H2S removal in landfill leachate treatment using UASB reactor [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2010, 26 (1): 91-95. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2010.01019]
Copy

H2S removal in landfill leachate treatment using UASB reactor()
Share:

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:
26
Issue:
2010 1
Page:
91-95
Research Field:
Environmental Science and Engineering
Publishing date:
2010-03-30

Info

Title:
H2S removal in landfill leachate treatment using UASB reactor
Author(s):
Hua Jia1 Zhang Linsheng1 Pan Yanli2 Li Yuezhong2
1School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
2Wehrle Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., Changzhou 213022, China
Keywords:
landfill leachate upflow anaerobic sludge blanket(UASB) H2S FeCl3 sulfur balance
PACS:
X506
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2010.01019
Abstract:
Leachate from a sanitary landfill site in Chengdu, China is treated using a hybrid-UASB reactor at pilot scale. H2S, resulting from the anaerobic bioconversion process of sulfate-reducing bacteria(SRB), inhibits the growth and activity of methane-producing bacteria(MPB)and poses serious problems of pollution, so FeCl3is used for H2S removal. The results show that the system performs well in the treatment process. COD removal generally increases with the increase in the organic loading rate(OLR), while the sulfate removal decreases slowly. As the OLR is higher than 7 kgCOD/(m3·d), both COD and sulfate removal tend to be stable. When the reactor is operated at the design load of 9 kgCOD/(m3·d), COD and sulfate removal remain about 79% and 91%, respectively. At the same time, the percentage of COD removed by SRB(CODSRB)also decreases from 8.9% to 4.0%. With FeCl3 addition, COD removal increases to 83%, while sulfate removal and CODSRBfurther decrease to 89% and 1.89%, respectively. According to the mass balance, nearly 82% of the sulfur is prevented from converting into H2S. Moreover, when the FeCl3 dosage is more than 1.6 g/L leachate, H2S can be removed totally from the biogas. Therefore, the application of FeCl3 for H2S removal in leachate treatment using the UASB reactor is very suitable and viable.

References:

[1] Lin C Y, Chang F Y, Chang C H. Co-digestion of leachate with septage using a UASB reactor [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2000, 73(2): 175-178.
[2] Jiménez-Rodríguez A M, Durán M M, Borja R, et al. Heavy metals removal from acid mine drainage water using biogenic hydrogen sulfide and effluent from anaerobic treatment: effect of pH [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 165(1/2/3): 759-765.
[3] Nagpal S, Chuichulcherm S, Livingston A, et al. Ethanol utilization by sulfate-reducing bacteria: an experimental and modeling study [J]. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2000, 70(5): 533-543.
[4] De Lima A C F, Goncalves M M M, Granato M, et al. Anaerobic sulphate-reducing microbial process using UASB reactor for heavy metals decontamination [J]. Environ Technol, 2001, 22(3): 261-270.
[5] Truong L V A, Abatzoglou N. A H2S reactive adsorption process for the purification of biogas prior to its use as bioenergy vector [J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005, 29(2): 142-151.
[6] Kapdi S S, Vijay V K, Rajesh S K, et al. Biogas scrubbing, compression and storage: perspective and prospectus in Indian context [J]. Renewable Energy, 2005, 30(8): 1195-1202.
[7] Pagella C, De Faveri D M. H2S gas treatment by iron bioprocess [J]. Chem Eng Sci, 2000, 55(12): 2185-2194.
[8] Ebrahimi S, Kleerebezem R, van Loosdrecht M C M, et al. Kinetics of the reactive absorption of hydrogen sulfide into aqueous ferric sulfate solutions [J]. Chem Eng Sci, 2003, 58(2): 417-427.
[9] Lar J S, Li X J. Removal of H2S during anaerobic bioconversion of dairy manure [J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2009, 17(2): 273-277.
[10] Velasco A, Ramírez M, Volke-Sepúveda T, et al. Evaluation of feed COD/sulfate ratio as a control criterion for the biological hydrogen sulfide production and lead precipitation [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 151(2/3): 407-413.
[11] APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater [M]. 20th ed. Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association, 1998.
[12] Omil F, Méndez R, Lema J M. Anaerobic treatment of saline wastewaters under high sulfide and ammonia content [J]. Bioresource Technology, 1995, 54(3): 269-278.
[13] Stabnikov V P, Ivanov V N. The effect of various iron hydroxide concentrations on the anaerobic fermentation of sulfate-containing model wastewater [J]. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 2006, 42(3): 284-288.
[14] Jeong T Y, Cha G C, Seo Y C, et al. Effect of COD/sulfate ratios on batch anaerobic digestion using waste activated sludge [J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2008, 14(5): 693-697.
[15] Schomaker A. Anaerobic digestion of agro-industrial wastes: information networks—technical summary on gas treatment [R]. Canada: Report of AD-NETT project FAIR-CT96-2083(DG12-SSMI), 2000.
[16] Song Z, Williams C J, Edyvean R G J. Coagulation and anaerobic digestion of tannery wastewater [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2001, 79(1): 23-28.

Memo

Memo:
Biographies: Hua Jia(1970—), male, graduate; Zhang Linsheng(corresponding author), male, professor, zhanglinsheng@seu.edu.cn.
Citation: Hua Jia, Zhang Linsheng, Pan Yanli, et al. H2S removal in landfill leachate treatment using UASB reactor[J]. Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2010, 26(1): 91-95.
Last Update: 2010-03-20