|Table of Contents|

[1] Chen Yuexia, Zha Qifen, Jing Peng, Cheng Hengquan, et al. Modeling and gender difference analysis of acceptanceof autonomous driving technology [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2021, (2): 216-221. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.02.012]

Modeling and gender difference analysis of acceptanceof autonomous driving technology()

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Research Field:
Traffic and Transportation Engineering
Publishing date:


Modeling and gender difference analysis of acceptanceof autonomous driving technology
Chen Yuexia1 Zha Qifen2 Jing Peng1 Cheng Hengquan1 Shao Danning1
1School of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
autonomous vehicle acceptance of autonomous driving technology technology acceptance model theory of planned behavior multiple indicators and multiple causes model
In order to deeply analyze the differences in the acceptance of autonomous driving technology among different gender groups, a multiple indicators and multiple causes model was constructed by integrating a technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior to comprehensively reveal the gender differences in the influence mechanisms of subjective and objective factors. The analysis is based on data collected from Chinese urban residents. Among objective factors, age has a significant negative impact on women’s perceived behavior control and a significant positive impact on perceived ease of use. Education has a significant positive impact on men’s perceived behavior control, and has a strong positive impact on women’s perceived usefulness(PU). For men, income and education are found to have strong positive impacts on perceived behavior control. Among subjective factors, perceived ease of use(PEU)has the greatest influence on women’s behavior intention, and it is the only influential factor for women’s intention to use autonomous driving technology, with an influence coefficient of 0.72. The influencing path of men’s intention to use autonomous driving technology is more complex. It is not only directly affected by the significant and positive joint effects of attitude and PU, but also indirectly affected by perceived behavior controls, subjective norms, and PEU.


[1] Zhang T R, Tao D, Qu X D, et, al. The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles[J].Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019, 98: 207-220. DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018.
[2] Perrine K A, Kockelman K M, Huang Y T. Anticipating long-distance travel shifts due to self-driving vehicles[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 82: 102547. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102547.
[3] Tang L, Qing S D, Xu Z G, et al. Research review on public acceptance of autonomous driving[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(2):131-146.(in Chinese)
[4] Jing P, Xu G, Chen Y X, et al. The determinants behind the acceptance of autonomous vehicles: A systematic review[J].Sustainability, 2020, 12(5): 1-26. DOI:10.3390/su12051719.
[5] Yuen K F, Wong Y D, Ma F, et al. The determinants of public acceptance of autonomous vehicles: An innovation diffusion perspective[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 270: 121904. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121904.
[6] Etzioni S, Hamadneh J, Elvarsson A B, et al. Modeling cross-national differences in automated vehicle acceptance[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(22): 1-22. DOI:10.3390/su12229765.
[7] Hohenberger C, Sp�F6;rrle M, Welpe I M. How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016, 94: 374-385. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.022.
[8] Kyriakidis M, Happee R, de Winter J C F. Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2015, 32: 127-140. DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014.
[9] Liu P, Zhang Y W, He Z. The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2019, 185: 341-347. DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2019.01.003.
[10] Payre W, Cestac J, Delhomme P. Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014, 27: 252-263. DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009.
[11] Chen C F, Chao W H. Habitual or reasoned? Using the theory of planned behavior, technology acceptance model, and habit to examine switching intentions toward public transit[J].Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2011, 14(2): 128-137. DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2010.11.006.
[12] Huang W. Research on the acceptance of fully autonomous vehicle based on theory of planned behavior and technology acceptance model[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2019.(in Chinese)
[13] Wang S Y, Fan J, Zhao D T, et al. Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: Using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model[J].Transportation, 2016, 43(1): 123-143. DOI:10.1007/s11116-014-9567-9.
[14] Jing P, Huang H, Ran B, et al. Exploring the factors affecting mode choice intention of autonomous vehicle based on an extended theory of planned behavior—a case study in China[J].Sustainability, 2019, 11(4): 1-20. DOI:10.3390/su11041155.
[15] Chen Y X, Chen L, Zha Q F, et al. A travel mode forecasting model based on low-carbon psychological latent variable logit model[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 34(9): 100-108, 137. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2017.09.014. (in Chinese)
[16] Qu W N, Sun H L, Ge Y. The effects of trait anxiety and the big five personality traits on self-driving car acceptance[J].Transportation, 2020: 1-17. DOI:10.1007/s11116-020-10143-7.
[17] Chen Y X, Chen L, Zha Q F, et al. Forecasting model of travel mode based on latent variable SVM[J]. Jonrnal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 46(6):1313-1317. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2016.06.034. (in Chinese)


Biography: Chen Yuexia(1982—), male, doctor, lecturer, chenyxia@ujs.edu.cn.
Foundation items: The National Key Research and Development Program of China(No. 2018YFB1601304), the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 71871107), Philosophy and Social Science Foundation Project of Universities in Jiangsu Province(No. 2020SJA2059).
Citation: Chen Yuexia, Zha Qifen, Jing Peng, et al. Modeling and gender difference analysis of acceptance of autonomous driving technology[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2021, 37(2):216-221.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.02.012.
Last Update: 2021-06-20