|Table of Contents|

[1] Gao Yueer, Cui jie, Cheng Jing, Ding Ming, et al. Suburban travel mode choice considering transitaccessibility of stops in public transport [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2021, (2): 222-226. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.02.013]

Suburban travel mode choice considering transitaccessibility of stops in public transport()

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Research Field:
Traffic and Transportation Engineering
Publishing date:


Suburban travel mode choice considering transitaccessibility of stops in public transport
Gao Yueer1 Cui jie2 Cheng Jing3 Ding Ming4 Wang Scarlett Sijia5
1 School of Architecture, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China
2Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China
3 School of Statistics, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China
4 Traffic Research Center, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China
5 Wagner School, New York University, New York 10012-9604, USA
transit accessibility of stops piecewise variable travel time mode choice suburbs
To analyze the influence of the transit accessibility of stops on the travel mode choices of suburban residents, the number of the lines passing by the stops within an accessible range of the resident origin and destination(OD)points and the average waiting time are used as the indexes of the transit accessibility of stops. Due to the correlation between travel time and accessible range, the transit accessibility of stops is contrasted as piecewise variables constrained by travel time. Taking the Jimei District of Xiamen, China, as an example, a binary logistic regression model of the suburban travel mode choice is constructed. The results show that it is necessary to construct transit accessibility of stops as piecewise variables. With a higher transit accessibility of stops, more residents will choose public transport. The choice of the travel mode is correlated with family attributes and personal characteristics. Morning and evening peak hours and travel distance have little effect on the choice of travel mode. Compared with the travel in urban areas, residents often chose public transport for travel within the suburbs. This research provides a basis for encouraging public transportation priority policies and decision making for transport planners in the suburbs.


[1] Etminani-Ghasrodashti R, Ardeshiri M. Modeling travel behavior by the structural relationships between lifestyle, built environment and non-working trips[J].Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 78: 506-518. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.016.
[2] Cheng J, Yan R Y, Gao Y E. Exploring spatial heterogeneity in accessibility and transit mode choice[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020, 87: 102521. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102521.
[3] Munshi T. Built environment and mode choice relationship for commute travel in the City of Rajkot, India[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2016, 44: 239-253. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.005.
[4] Nassir N, Hickman M, Malekzadeh A, et al. A utility-based travel impedance measure for public transit network accessibility[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016, 88: 26-39. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.007.
[5] Chakrabarti S. How can public transit get people out of their cars? An analysis of transit mode choice for commute trips in Los Angeles[J]. Transport Policy, 2017, 54: 80-89. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.11.005.
[6] Guan J P, Xu C Z. Are relocatees different from others? Relocatee’s travel mode choice and travel equity analysis in large-scale residential areas on the periphery of megacity Shanghai, China[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018, 111: 162-173. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2018.03.011.
[7] Orsi F, de Geneletti D. Assessing the effects of access policies on travel mode choices in an Alpine tourist destination[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014, 39: 21-35. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.015.
[8] Ghader S, Carrion C, Tang L, et al. A copula-based continuous cross-nested logit model for tour scheduling in activity-based travel demand models[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2021, 145: 324-341. DOI:10.1016/j.trb.2021.01.001.
[9] DeSalvo J S, Huq M. Mode choice, commuting cost, and urban household behavior[J]. Journal of Regional Science, 2005, 45(3): 493-517. DOI:10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00381.x.
[10] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Code for planning and design of urban road traffic: GB 50220-95[S]. Beijing: MOHURD, 1995.(in Chinese)
[11] Meng Y P. The influence of spatial distribution characteristics of residence and employment on commuting traffic in Xiamen[C]//Annual National Planning Conference. Kunming, China, 2012:143-149.
[12] China Highway Engineering Consulting Group Co., Ltd. Planning research text of parking layout optimization in Jimei district[R]. Xiamen, China: China Highway English Consulting Group Co., Ltd., 2016.
[13] Xiamen public transport network density of 4.05 km / km2, higher than standard in China[EB/OL].(2016-08-10)[2020-01-17]. https://www.sohu.com/a/109829518_257343.


Biography: Gao Yueer(1983—), female, doctor, professor.
Foundation items: The National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.52078224), Promotion Program for Young and Middle-Aged Teachers in Science and Technology Research at Huaqiao University(No. 600005-Z17X0170).
Citation: Gao Yueer, Cui jie, Cheng Jing, et al.Suburban travel mode choice considering transit accessibility of stops in public transport[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2021, 37(2):222-226.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.02.013.
Last Update: 2021-06-20