|Table of Contents|

[1] Lu Zheng, Yan Deyu, Zhou Mengyao, et al. Vulnerability analysis of a complex super high-rise connected structure under the combined action of earthquake and wind [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2024, 40 (1): 13-23. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2024.01.002]

Vulnerability analysis of a complex super high-rise connected structure under the combined action of earthquake and wind()

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

2024 1
Research Field:
Civil Engineering
Publishing date:


Vulnerability analysis of a complex super high-rise connected structure under the combined action of earthquake and wind
Lu Zheng1 2 Yan Deyu1 Zhou Mengyao1 Zhao Xin3 Zhao Yiqing4
1Department of Disaster Mitigation for Structures, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
3Tongji Architectural Design(Group)Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China
4China Overseas Development Group Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518048, China
super high-rise connected structure multi-hazard vulnerability earthquake wind load combined action Suzhou Supertall
To explore the design and safety performance of super high-rise connected structures under the combined action of multiple disasters, taking Suzhou Supertall as an example, a vulnerability analysis is conducted under the combined earthquake-wind actions. First, the structure’s finite element model is established. Then, vulnerability assessments are conducted under individual earthquake and combined earthquake-wind actions. Finally, the response law of the structure is obtained. Results indicate that when exposed to combined earthquake-wind actions, the structure’s vulnerability increases with the earthquake and wind intensities, and the seismic action dominates structural damage. The probabilities of moderate, severe, and collapse damages are higher under the combined earthquake-wind actions than those under individual earthquakes. When the wind speed reaches 40 m/s, the probabilities of the structure reaching three failure states under rare earthquakes are 99.77%, 91.56%, and 46.54%, respectively, representing an increase of 1.11%, 10.73% and 14.65% compared with those under rare earthquakes alone and an increase of 0.27%, 6.26% and 14.34% compared with those of a typical high-rise connected structure under the same combined action of disasters.


[1] Ding J M, Wu H L, Zhao X. Current situation and discussion of structural design for super high-rise buildings above 250 m in China[J].Journal of Building Structures, 2014, 35(3): 1-7. DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2014.03.002. (in Chinese)
[2 Xie Y S, Xu Z D, Wang H. Occupant comfort evaluation of high-rise building under wind loads using LES[J]. Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2023, 39(2): 127-132. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985. 2023.02.003.
[3] Zhang Z X, Chen Q J. A comparative study on long-period seismic responses for high-rise structures[J].Structure engineers, 2009, 25(4): 78-84. DOI:10.15935/j.cnki.jggcs.2009.04.020. (in Chinese)
[4] Cheng Y, Dong Y R, Bai G L, et al. IDA-based seismic vulnerability of high-rise frame-core tube structure subjected to multi-dimensional long-period ground motions[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 43:102917. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102917.
[5] Jing F, Zhang L, Singh R P, et al. Quasi-coseismic variations and geosphere coupling associated with the strong 2023 Turkey earthquakes[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 907:167963. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167963.
[6] Jin S G, Han L, Cho J. Lower atmospheric anomalies following the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake observed by GPS measurements[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-terrestrial Physics, 2011, 73(7/8): 810-814. DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2011.01.023.
[7] Fujibe F. Localized strong winds associated with extensive fires in central Tokyo: Cases of the Great Kanto Earthquake(1923)and an air attack in World War Ⅱ(1945)[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 181: 79-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.08.016.
[8] Zheng X W, Li H N, Yang Y B, et al. Damage risk assessment of a high-rise building against multihazard of earthquake and strong wind with recorded data[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 200:109697. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109697.
[9] Xu L H, Liu Y Y, Xie X S. Performance study of steel frame self-centering braced tube structure under coupling action of earthquake and wind[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39(11): 186-195. DOI:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2021.07.0517. (in Chinese)
[10] Xie L L, Li X Y, Li A Q, et al. Fragility models of precast concrete shear walls with grouted sleeves[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 51(6): 935-941. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2021.06.003. (in Chinese)
[11] Jiang H, Li C, Feng M Y, et al. Analysis on probabilistic seismic damage characteristics of dry joint prefabricated bridge pier based on kernel density estimation[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 51(4): 566-574. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2021.04.003. (in Chinese)
[12] Shen H J, Wang H, Zheng W Z, et al. Analysis of critical directions of earthquake input of high-speed railway continuous girder bridges based on fragility analysis method[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 49(5): 926-932. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2019.05.016. (in Chinese)
[13] Lu X L, Su N F, Zhou Y. IDA-based seismic vulnerability analysis of a complex high-rise structure[J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2012, 32(5): 19-25. DOI:10.13197/j.eeev.2012.05.017. (in Chinese)
[14] Zhou Y, Lu X L, Bu Y. Application of incremental dynamic analysis to seismic evaluation of hybrid structure[J].Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2010, 38(2): 183-187, 193. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2010.02.006. (in Chinese)
[15] Wang F, Li H N. Seismic damage assessment procedure of structures by using simplified IDA[J].Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(12): 194-202. DOI:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.04.0246. (in Chinese)
[16] Li H N, Li G, Zheng X W, et al. Research progress in engineering structures subject to multiple hazards[J].China Civil Engineering Journal, 2021, 54(5): 1-14. DOI:10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2021.05.001. (in Chinese)
[17] Wang Z J. Multi-hazard vulnerability analysis of isolated high-rise frame-shear-wall under wind-earthquake action[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University of Technology, 2022.(in Chinese)
[18] Zhou Y, Shan H W, Xing L L, et al. Study on vulnerability of Shanghai Tower under combined actions of wind and earthquake[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 36(2): 1-11. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6069.2020.02.001. (in Chinese)
[19] Zheng X W, Li H N, Gardoni P. Hybrid Bayesian-Copula-based risk assessment for tall buildings subject to wind loads considering various uncertainties[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 233: 109100. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109100.
[20] Zheng X W, Li H N, Shi Z Q. Hybrid AI-Bayesian-based demand models and fragility estimates for tall buildings against multi-hazard of earthquakes and winds[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2023, 187: 110749. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.110749.
[21] Zheng X W, Li H N, Gardoni P. Reliability-based design approach for high-rise buildings subject to earthquakes and strong winds[J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 244: 112771. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112771.
[22] Zheng X W, Li H N, Gardoni P. Probabilistic seismic demand models and life-cycle fragility estimates for high-rise buildings[J]. ASCE—Journal of Structural Engineering, 2021, 147(12): 04021216. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003216.
[23] Zheng X W, Li H N. Life-cycle failure probability analysis of deteriorated RC bridges under multiple hazards of earthquakes and strong winds[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2022, 21(3): 811-823. DOI: 10.1007/s11803-022-2111-6.
[24] Yang L S, Chen X, Tan L H, et al. Study on joint vulnerability analysis method of conjoined high-rise buildings under combined actions of earthquake and wind[J].Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2023, 40(6): 902-911. DOI: 10.7511/jslx20220610002.(in Chinese).
[25] Federal Emergency Management Agency. Quantification of building seismic performance factors[R]. Washington DC, USA: FEMA P-695, 2009.
[26] US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. LRFD seismic analysis and design of transportation geotechnical features and structural foundations reference manual[R]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Highway Administration, 2011.
[27] Liu X T. Research on probabilistic response spectrum and ground motion parameter spectrum of class Ⅱ site[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao Technological University, 2018.(in Chinese)
[28] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of People’s Republic of China. Code for seismic design of buildings(2016 version): GB 50011—2010[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2016.(in Chinese)
[29] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of People’s Republic of China. Load code for the design of building structures: GB 50009—2012[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2012.(in Chinese)
[30] Yuan B, Zeng M H, Li X Z. Base on FFT method to simulate fluctuating wind and Matlab realization[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2013, 39(5): 29-32, 42. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1933.2013.05.007. (in Chinese)
[31] Sun Z.Computer simulation and analysis of wind loading of structures[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007.(in Chinese)
[32] Liu X L, Zhou Y. Numerical simulation methods of wind load[J].Industrial Construction, 2005(5): 81-84. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-8993.2005.05.021. (in Chinese)
[33] Yan S, Zheng W. Wind load simulation by superposition of harmonic[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University(Natural Science), 2005(1): 1-4. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1922.2005.01.001. (in Chinese)
[34] Lu D G, Li X P, Wang G Y. Global seismic vulnerability analysis of structures based on reliability and performance[J].Journal of Natural Disasters, 2006(2): 107-114. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4574.2006.02.018. (in Chinese)
[35] Lu G Y, Wang K H, Zhang PP. Performance-based system seismic assessment for long-span suspension bridges under two-level seismic hazard[J]. Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2019, 35(4): 464-475. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2019.04.009.
[36] Wen Y, Ellingwood B R, Bracci J M. Vulnerability function framework for consequence-based engineering[R]. Chicago, IL, USA: MAE Center, 2004.
[37] Cornell C A, Jalayer F, Hamburger R O, et al. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2002, 128(4): 526-533. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).


Biography: Lu Zheng(1982—), male, doctor, professor, luzheng111@tongji.edu.cn.
Foundation item: National Key Research and Development Program of China(No. 2022YFC3803000).
Citation: Lu Zheng, Yan Deyu, Zhou Mengyao, et al. Vulnerability analysis of a complex super high-rise connected structure under the combined action of earthquake and wind[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2024, 40(1):13-23.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2024.01.002.
Last Update: 2024-03-20