[1] Patton Ron. Software testing [M]. Indianapolis: Sams Publishing, 2001.
[2] Cohen D M, Dalal S R, Fredman M L, et al. The AETG system: an approach to testing based on combinatorial design [J]. IEEE Trans on Software Engineering, 1997, 23(7): 437-444.
[3] Cohen D M, Dalal S R, Parelius J, et al. The combinatorial design approach to automatic test generation [J]. IEEE Software, 1996, 13(5): 83-87.
[4] Lei Y, Tai K C. In_parameter_oder: a test gene ̄ration strategy for pairwise testing [R]. Technical Report TR-2001-03. Raleigh, North Carolina: Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, 2001.
[5] Tai K C, Lei Y. A test generation strategy for pairwise testing [J]. IEEE Trans on Software Engineering, 2002, 28(1): 109-111.
[6] Kobayashi N, Tsuchiya T, Kikuno T. A new method for constructing pairwise covering designs for software testing [J]. Information Processing Letters, 2002, 81(2): 85-91.
[7] Heller E. Using design of experiment structures to generate test cases [A]. In: Proc 12th Int’l Conf Testing Computer Software, ACM [C]. New York, 1995. 33-41.
[8] Mandl R. Orthogonal Latin squares: an application of experimental design to compiler testing [J]. Communications of the ACM, 1985, 28(10): 1054-1058.
[9] Brownlie R, Prowse J, Phadke M. Robust testing of AT&T PMX/StarMail using OATS [J]. AT&T Technical Journal, 1992, 71(3): 41-47.
[10] Cohen D M, Fredman M L. New techniques for designing qualitatively independent systems [J]. J Combin Designs, 1998, 6(6): 411-416.
[11] Williams A W, Probert R L. A practical strategy for testing pairwise coverage of network interfaces [A]. In: Proc 7th International Symp Software Reliability Engineer [C]. 1997. 246-254.
[12] Fang K T, Wang Y. Number-theoretic methods in statistics [M]. London: Chapman & Hall, 1993.