|Table of Contents|

[1] Arash Hosseinpour, PENG Qingjin, GU Peihua,. A quantitative method for sustainable product development [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2015, 31 (1): 87-93. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2015.01.015]
Copy

A quantitative method for sustainable product development()
一种量化的可持续产品发展方法
Share：

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:
31
Issue:
2015 1
Page:
87-93
Research Field:
Mechanical Engineering
Publishing date:
2015-03-30

Info

Title:
A quantitative method for sustainable product development
一种量化的可持续产品发展方法
Author(s):
Arash Hosseinpour1;  PENG Qingjin1;  GU Peihua2
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 5V6, Canada
2Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
Arash Hosseinpour1;  彭庆金1;  顾佩华2
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 5V6, Canada; 2汕头大学机械电子工程系, 汕头 515063
Keywords:
sustainability;  product design;  life cycle assessment;  benchmarking
可持续性;  产品设计;  生命周期评估;  基准测试
PACS:
TB21, TB472
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2015.01.015
Abstract:
A quantitative measure-based method for the design and evaluation of sustainable products is proposed. The method uses multi-criteria in product design to meet sustainable requirements from qualitative criteria to quantitative metrics. The method integrates quality function deployment concepts with the life cycle assessment to establish a quantitative method for sustainable product development. It considers both customer needs and sustainable requirements by mapping these needs into design details using the axiomatic design and benchmarking methods. The method is applied in the wheelchair design. Four popular wheelchairs in the market are selected as benchmarks and are rated based on customer needs and sustainable criteria. The design matrix identifies the relationship of functional requirements and design parameters of the wheelchair. Compared to the best benchmark product, the proposed wheelchair can reduce costs by 13.8%, environment footprints 18.55%, mass 4.5%, and components 2.2%.
提出了基于量化的可持续产品设计和评估方法.该方法使用产品设计的多标准来满足可持续产品从定性到定量的设计要求.建立的可持续发展产品定量方法集成了质量功能展开的概念与生命周期评估方法.它同时考虑客户需求和可持续发展的要求, 并通过公理设计映射和基准测试方法将这些需求变为设计细节.将提出的方法应用在轮椅设计中.其设计基准选用了4种常用的轮椅并将其根据客户需求和可持续要求评级.设计矩阵用来确定轮椅功能要求和设计参数的关系.与最好的基准产品相比, 所设计的轮椅可以降低成本13.8%, 环境足迹18.55%, 质量4.5%, 以及组件数量2.2%.

References:

[1] Dym C L, Little P, Orwin E J, et al. Engineering design: a project-based introduction [M]. New York: Wiley, 2004.
[2] Cross N. Engineering design methods: strategies for product design [M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
[3] Pugh S. Total design: integrated methods for successful product engineering [M]. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley, 1991.
[4] Brundtland G H. World commission on environment and development, our common future [M]. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1987: 8-9.
[5] McLennan J F. The philosophy of sustainable design: the future of architecture [M]. Ecotone Publishing, 2004.
[6] Rosen M, Kishawy H. Sustainable manufacturing and design: concepts, practices and needs [J]. Sustainability, 2012, 4(2): 154-174.
[7] Remmen A, Jensen A A, Frydendal J. Life cycle management: a business guide to sustainability [M]. UNEP/Earthprint, 2007.
[8] Finkbeiner M, Schau E M, Lehmann A, et al. Towards life cycle sustainability assessment [J]. Sustainability, 2010, 2(10): 3309-3322.
[9] Ullman D G. The mechanical design process [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992.
[10] Bohm M R, Haapala K R, Poppa K, et al. Integrating life cycle assessment into the conceptual phase of design using a design repository [J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2010, 132(9): 091005.
[11] Gilchrist B P, Tumer I Y, Stone R B, et al. Comparison of environmental impacts of innovative and common products [C]//ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Chicago, USA, 2012: 825-834.
[12] Ramani K, Ramanujan D, Bernsteinv W Z, et al. Integrated sustainable life cycle design: a review [J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2010, 132(9): 091004.
[13] Graedel B R, Allenby T E. Industrial ecology [M]. 2nd ed. New York: Prentice Hall, 2003.
[14] Lee K M, Park P J. EcoDesign: best practice of ISO-14062 [R]. Suwon: Eco-product Research Institute, Ajou University, Korea, 2005.
[15] Luttropp C, Lagerstedt J. EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2006, 14(15): 1396-1408.
[16] Curran M A. Environmental life-cycle assessment [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1996, 1(3):179.
[17] In B M, Curran M A. Life-cycle assessment: inventory guidelines and principles [M]. CRC Press, 1994.
[18] Bernstein W Z, Ramanujan D, Devanathan S, et al. Function impact matrix for sustainable concept generation: a designer’s perspective [C]//ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Montreal, Canada, 2010: 1-12.
[19] Masui K, Sakao T, Kobayashi M, et al. Applying quality function deployment to environmentally conscious design [J]. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2003, 20(1): 90-106.
[20] Ernzer M, Birkhofer H. Requirements for environmentally friendly and marketable products, product development methods and tools [M]. London: Springer-Verlag, 2005.
[21] Rathod S, Vinodh S, Madhyasta U R. Integration of ECQFD and LCA for enabling sustainable product design in an electric vehicle manufacturing organization [J]. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 2011, 4(3): 202-214.
[22] Gilchrist B, Van Bossuyt D L, Tumer I Y, et al. Functional impact comparison of common and innovative products [C]//ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Portland, USA, 2013: 1-10.
[23] Abele E, Anderl R, Birkhofer H. Environmentally-friendly product development: methods and tools [M]. Springer, 2005.
[24] Bogan C E, English M J. Benchmarking for best practices: winning through innovative adaptation [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
[25] SolidWorks Corp. SolidWorks web help[EB/OL].(2014)[2014-06-15]. http://help.solidworks.com.

Memo

Memo:
Biography: Arash Hosseinpour(1984—), male, master, engineer, arash.irani63@gmail.com.
Foundation items: The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council(NSERC)of Canada(No.RGPIN/239189-2010), the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.51375287).
Citation: Arash Hosseinpour, PENG Qingjin, GU Peihua. A quantitative method for sustainable product development[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2015, 31(1):87-93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2015.01.015]
Last Update: 2015-03-20