[1] Wang Yanhua, Lü Jing, Wu Jing, Wang Cheng, et al. Prediction method of restoring force based on online AdaBoostregression tree algorithm in hybrid test [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2020, 36 (2): 181-187. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2020.02.008]
Copy
Prediction method of restoring force based on online AdaBoostregression tree algorithm in hybrid test(
)
基于在线AdaBoost回归树算法的混合试验恢复力预测方法
)Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]
- Volumn:
- 36
- Issue:
- 2020 2
- Page:
- 181-187
- Research Field:
- Civil Engineering
- Publishing date:
- 2020-06-20
Info
- Title:
- Prediction method of restoring force based on online AdaBoostregression tree algorithm in hybrid test
- 基于在线AdaBoost回归树算法的混合试验恢复力预测方法
- Author(s):
- Wang Yanhua; Lü Jing; Wu Jing; Wang Cheng
- Key Laboratory of Concrete and Pre-stressed Concrete Structures of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
- PACS:
- TU352
- DOI:
- 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2020.02.008
- Abstract:
- In order to solve the poor generalization ability of the back-propagation(BP)neural network in the model updating hybrid test, a novel method called the AdaBoost regression tree algorithm is introduced into the model updating procedure in hybrid tests. During the learning phase, the regression tree is selected as a weak regression model to be trained, and then multiple trained weak regression models are integrated into a strong regression model. Finally, the training results are generated through voting by all the selected regression models. A 2-DOF nonlinear structure was numerically simulated by utilizing the online AdaBoost regression tree algorithm and the BP neural network algorithm as a contrast. The results show that the prediction accuracy of the online AdaBoost regression algorithm is 48.3% higher than that of the BP neural network algorithm, which verifies that the online AdaBoost regression tree algorithm has better generalization ability compared to the BP neural network algorithm. Furthermore, it can effectively eliminate the influence of weight initialization and improve the prediction accuracy of the restoring force in hybrid tests.
- 为了解决模型更新混合试验中BP神经网络算法泛化能力较差的问题, 引入了一种新方法——AdaBoost回归树算法作为混合试验中的模型更新算法.在学习阶段, 选择回归树作为弱回归模型进行训练, 然后将多个弱回归模型集成为一个强回归模型, 最后对训练结果进行表决输出.利用在线AdaBoost回归树算法和BP神经网络算法作为模型更新算法, 对一个二自由度非线性结构进行了数值模拟.结果表明, 在线AdaBoost回归树算法的预测精度比神经网络高48.3%, 证实了AdaBoost回归树算法比BP神经网络算法具有更好的泛化能力, 并且有效消除了权重初始化的影响, 提高了混合试验中恢复力的预测精度.
References:
[1] Wu B, Xu G S, Wang Q, et al. Operator-splitting method for real-time substructure testing [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2006, 35(3): 293-314. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.519.
[2] Wu B, Bao H, Ou J, et al. Stability and accuracy analysis of the central difference method for real-time substructure testing [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2005, 34(7): 705-718. DOI:10.1002/eqe.451.
[3] Nakashima M, Kato H, Takaoka E. Development of real-time pseudo dynamic testing [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1992, 21(1): 79-92. DOI:10.1002/eqe.4290210106.
[4] Wang Z, Wang Z R, Yang J, et al. Secondary development of MTS control system and its application to hybrid tests [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2015, 35(2): 22-29. DOI:10.13197/j.eeev.2015.02.22.wangz.003. (in Chinese)
[5] Xu W J, Guo T, Chen C. Research in parameter α of inverse compensation for real-time hybrid simulation [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(6): 61-67. DOI:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2014.12.1075. (in Chinese)
[6] Wu B, Ning X Z, Xu G S, et al. A novel hybrid simulation method considering incomplete boundary conditions [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37(15): 150-155. DOI:10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2018.15.021. (in Chinese)
[7] Kwon O S, Elnashai A S, Spencer B F. A framework for distributed analytical and hybrid simulations [J]. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2008, 30(3): 331-350. DOI:10.12989/sem.2008.30.3.331.
[8] Chuang M C, Hsieh S H, Tsai K C, et al. Parameter identification for on-line model updating in hybrid simulations using a gradient-based method [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2018, 47(2): 269-293. DOI:10.1002/eqe.2950.
[9] Yang Y S, Tsai K C, Elnashai A S, et al. An online optimization method for bridge dynamic hybrid simulations [J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2012, 28: 42-54. DOI:10.1016/j.simpat.2012.06.002.
[10] Wang T, Wu B, Zhang J. Online identification with least square method for pseudo-dynamic tests [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 250/251/252/253:2455-2459. DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.250-253.2455.
[11] Hashemi M J, Masroor A, Mosqueda G. Implementation of online model updating in hybrid simulation [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2014, 43(3): 395-412. DOI:10.1002/eqe.2350.
[12] Wang T, Wu B. Hybrid testing method based on model updating with constrained unscented Kalman filter [J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2013, 33(5): 100-109. DOI:10.13197/j.eeev.2013.05.100.wangt.013. (in Chinese)
[13] Wu B, Wang T. Model updating with constrained unscented Kalman filter for hybrid testing [J]. Smart Structures and Systems, 2014, 14(6): 1105-1129. DOI:10.12989/sss.2014.14.6.1105.
[14] Ou G, Dyke S J, Prakash A. Real time hybrid simulation with online model updating: An analysis of accuracy [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2017, 84: 223-240. DOI:10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.06.015.
[15] Elanwar H H, Elnashai A S. Framework for online model updating in earthquake hybrid simulations [J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 20(1): 80-100. DOI:10.1080/13632469.2015.1051637.
[16] Wang T, Zhan X H, Meng L Y. Hybrid testing method based on an online neural network algorithm [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(14): 1-8. DOI:10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.14.001. (in Chinese)
[17] Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone C J, et al. Classification and regression trees [M]. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 1984.
[18] Freund Y, Schapire R E. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting [C]// Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computational Learning Theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995: 23-27. DOI:10.1007/3-540-59119-2_166.
[19] Kim J, Ghaboussi J, Elnashai A S. Hysteretic mechanical-informational modeling of bolted steel frame connections [J]. Engineering Structures, 2012, 45: 1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.014.
Memo
- Memo:
-
Biography: Wang Yanhua(1977—), female, doctor, senior engineer, wyh00737@seu.edu.cn.
Foundation item: The National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.51708110).
Citation: Wang Yanhua, Lü Jing, Wu Jing, et al.Prediction method of restoring force based on online AdaBoost regression tree algorithm in hybrid test[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2020, 36(2):181-187.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2020.02.008.