|Table of Contents|

[1] Bian Yang, Li Ling, Han Tangshan, Jia Dazhi, et al. TOD typology: A review of research achievements [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2021, 37 (3): 306-316. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.03.011]
Copy

TOD typology: A review of research achievements()
TOD类型:研究成果回顾
Share:

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:
37
Issue:
2021 3
Page:
306-316
Research Field:
Architecture
Publishing date:
2021-09-20

Info

Title:
TOD typology: A review of research achievements
TOD类型:研究成果回顾
Author(s):
Bian Yang Li Ling Han Tangshan Jia Dazhi
Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
边扬 李玲 韩唐姗 贾大智
北京工业大学交通工程北京市重点实验室, 北京 100124
Keywords:
transit-oriented development(TOD) literature review bibliometrics VOSviewer
TOD 文献综述 文献计量学 VOSviewer
PACS:
TU984
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.03.011
Abstract:
To comprehensively and systematically review the research achievements of transit-oriented development(TOD)typology, a total of 41 papers were collected from the Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection databases. These papers were analyzed by bibliometric indicators, in adopting VOSviewer software to draw graphical visualizations. A review of international and domestic research progress in TOD typologies was conducted. The results indicate that the number of published papers has increased over time. Luca Bertolini is the most contributive author, and the top three contributing organizations are Queensland University of Technology, the University of Amsterdam, and the University of Lisbon. The United States is the most active source country, followed by the Netherlands and Australia. TOD typology methods were analyzed from the aspects of principles, indicators, advantages, and disadvantages and their applications. In recent years, domestic scholars have paid attention to the importance of TOD typologies and applied them in different urban contexts to facilitate the TOD development in China. The understanding of the TOD typology research progress is helpful for developing context-based TOD typology approaches.
为了对TOD类型学的研究成果进行全面、系统的综述, 从Scopus和Web of Science核心数据库中共收集41篇论文, 利用文献计量指标对其进行分析, 采用VOSviewer软件绘制文献计量图谱, 并对TOD类型的国内外研究进展进行了综述.结果表明, 随着时间的推移, 论文发表数量有所增加.Luca Bertolini是贡献最多的作者, 发表论文最多的3家机构分别是昆士兰科技大学、阿姆斯特丹大学和里斯本大学.美国是发表论文最多的国家, 其次是荷兰和澳大利亚.从原理、指标、优缺点及应用等方面对TOD分类方法进行了分析.近年来, 国内学者已经关注到TOD类型的重要性, 并将其应用于不同的城市背景中, 以深化中国TOD的发展.本研究有助于进一步理解TOD类型的研究进展, 为开发基于不同背景的TOD分类方法提供支撑.

References:

[1] Wegener M. Overview of land use transport models[M]//Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2004: 127-146.
[2] Knight R L, Trygg L L. Land use impacts of rapid transit: Implications of recent experience. Final report[R]. San Francisco, USA: De Leuw, Cather and Co., 1977.
[3] Stover V G, Koepke F J. Transportation and land development[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1988.
[4] Calthorpe P. The next American metropolis: Ecology, community and the American dream[M]. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1993: 56-61.
[5] Center for Transit-Oriented Development. Performance-based transit-oriented development typology guidebook[EB/OL].(2010)[2020-07-09]. https://trid.trb.org/view/1097129.
[6] Kamruzzaman M, Baker D, Washington S, et al. Advance transit oriented development typology: Case study in Brisbane, Australia[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014, 34: 54-70. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.11.002.
[7] Phani Kumar P, Ravi Sekhar C, Parida M. Identification of neighborhood typology for potential transit-oriented development[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020, 78: 102186. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.015.
[8] Jeffrey D, Boulangé C, Giles-Corti B, et al. Using walkability measures to identify train stations with the potential to become transit oriented developments located in walkable neighbourhoods[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2019, 76: 221-231. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.009.
[9] Ibraeva A, de Almeida Correia G H, Silva C, et al. Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 132: 110-130. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2019.10.018.
[10] Rashidi T H, Najmi A, Haider A, et al. What we know and do not know about connected and autonomous vehicles[J]. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 2020, 16(3): 987-1029. DOI:10.1080/23249935.2020.1720860.
[11] Dolati Neghabadi P, Evrard Samuel K, Espinouse M L. Systematic literature review on city logistics: Overview, classification and analysis[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2019, 57(3): 865-887. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2018.1489153.
[12] Gil M, Wróbel K, Montewka J, et al. A bibliometric analysis and systematic review of shipboard Decision Support Systems for accident prevention[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 128: 104717. DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104717.
[13] Modak N M, Merigó J M, Weber R, et al. Fifty years of transportation research journals: A bibliometric overview[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2019, 120: 188-223. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2018.11.015.
[14] Jiang C M, Bhat C R, Lam W H K. A bibliometric overview of transportation research part B: Methodological in the past forty years(1979—2019)[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2020, 138: 268-291. DOI:10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.016.
[15] Zou X, Vu H L, Huang H L. Fifty years of accident analysis & prevention: A bibliometric and scientometric overview[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 144: 105568. DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105568.
[16] Xie X, Jiang X, Wang Y, et al. Comparative analysis of scopus and web of science[J]. Science and Technology & Innovation, 2017(4): 8-10. DOI:10.15913/j.cnki.kjycx.2017.04.008. (in Chinese)
[17] Liu T Y. The relationship and difference of bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics[J]. Library & Information, 1994(1): 19-24.(in Chinese)
[18] Van Eck N J, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2): 523-538. DOI:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
[19] Bertolini L. Nodes and places: Complexities of railway station redevelopment[J]. European Planning Studies, 1996, 4(3): 331-345. DOI:10.1080/09654319608720349.
[20] Bertolini L. Spatial development patterns and public transport: The application of an analytical model in the Netherlands[J]. Planning Practice & Research, 1999, 14(2): 199-210. DOI:10.1080/02697459915724.
[21] Higgins C D, Kanaroglou P S. A latent class method for classifying and evaluating the performance of station area transit-oriented development in the Toronto region[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2016, 52: 61-72. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.02.012.
[22] Lyu G W, Bertolini L, Pfeffer K. Developing a TOD typology for Beijing metro station areas[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2016, 55: 40-50. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.07.002.
[23] Dittmar H, Ohland G. The new transit town: Best practices in transit-oriented development[M]. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 2004: 19-40.
[24] The Department of Infrastructure and Planning. Transit oriented development guide: Guide for practitioners in Queensland[R]. Brisbane: The Department of Infrastructure and Planning, 2010.
[25] Florida Department of Transportation. Florida TOD guidebook[R]. Tallahassee, USA: Florida Department of Transportation, 2012.
[26] Ministry of Urban Development. Transit-oriented development guidance document[R]. New Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development, 2016.
[27] Ivan I, Boruta T, Horák J. Evaluation of railway surrounding areas: The case of Ostrava City[J]. Urban Transport ⅩⅧ-Urban Transport and the Environment in the 21st Century, 2012, 128: 141-152.
[28] Reusser D E, Loukopoulos P, Stauffacher M, et al. Classifying railway stations for sustainable transitions—balancing node and place functions[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2008, 16(3): 191-202. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.05.004.
[29] Vale D S. Transit-oriented development, integration of land use and transport, and pedestrian accessibility: Combining node-place model with pedestrian shed ratio to evaluate and classify station areas in Lisbon[J].Journal of Transport Geography, 2015, 45: 70-80. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.04.009.
[30] Monajem S, Ekram Nosratian F. The evaluation of the spatial integration of station areas via the node place model; an application to subway station areas in Tehran[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2015, 40: 14-27. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2015.07.009.
[31] Chorus P, Bertolini L. An application of the node place model to explore the spatial development dynamics of station areas in Tokyo[J]. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2011, 4(1): 45-58. DOI: 10.5198/jtlu.v4i1.145.
[32] Zemp S, Stauffacher M, Lang D J, et al. Classifying railway stations for strategic transport and land use planning: Context matters![J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2011, 19(4): 670-679. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.008.
[33] Zhang Y R, Marshall S, Manley E. Network criticality and the node-place-design model: Classifying metro station areas in greater London[J].Journal of Transport Geography, 2019, 79: 102485. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102485.
[34] Su S L, Zhang H, Wang M, et al. Transit-oriented development(TOD)typologies around metro station areas in urban China: A comparative analysis of five typical megacities for planning implications[J].Journal of Transport Geography, 2021, 90: 102939. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102939.
[35] Groenendijk L, Rezaei J, Correia G. Incorporating the travellers’ experience value in assessing the quality of transit nodes: A Rotterdam case study[J]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2018, 6(4): 564-576. DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2018.07.007.
[36] Schlossberg M, Brown N. Comparing transit-oriented development sites by walkability indicators[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2004, 1887(1): 34-42. DOI:10.3141/1887-05.
[37] Vale D S, Viana C M, Pereira M. The extended node-place model at the local scale: Evaluating the integration of land use and transport for Lisbon’s subway network[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2018, 69: 282-293. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.004.
[38] Olaru D, Moncrieff S, McCarney G, et al. Place vs. node transit: Planning policies revisited[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(2): 477. DOI:10.3390/su11020477.
[39] Belzer D, Autler G. Transit oriented development: Moving from rhetoric to reality[M]. Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, 2002.
[40] Kamruzzaman M, Wood L, Hine J, et al. Patterns of social capital associated with transit oriented development[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014, 35: 144-155. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.02.003.
[41] Rodriguez D A, Vergel-Tovar C E. Urban development around bus rapid transit stops in seven cities in Latin-America[J]. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 2018, 11(2): 175-201. DOI:10.1080/17549175.2017.1372507.
[42] Kamruzzaman M, Deilami K, Yigitcanlar T. Investigating the urban heat island effect of transit oriented development in Brisbane[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2018, 66: 116-124. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.016.
[43] Curtis C, Renne J L, Bertolini L. Transit oriented development: Making it happen[M]. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2009.
[44] Papa E, Moccia F D, Angiello G, et al. An accessibility planning tool for network transit oriented development: SNAP[J]. Planum, 2013, 2(27): 1-9.
[45] Caset F, Vale D S, Viana C M. Measuring the accessibility of railway stations in the Brussels regional express network: A node-place modeling approach[J]. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2018, 18(3): 495-530. DOI:10.1007/s11067-018-9409-y.
[46] Tamakloe R, Hong J. Assessing the efficiency of integrated public transit stations based on the concept of transit-oriented development[J]. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 2020, 16(3): 1459-1489. DOI:10.1080/23249935.2020.1753849.
[47] Seo M, Lee D. Typological differences in railway station areas according to locational characteristics: A nationwide study of Korea[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(8): 4310. DOI:10.3390/su13084310.
[48] Niu S, Hu A, Shen Z, et al. Measuring the built environment of green transit-oriented development: A factor-cluster analysis of rail station areas in Singapore[J/OL]. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2021. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263521000261.
[49] Atkinson-Palombo C, Kuby M J. The geography of advance transit-oriented development in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, 2000—2007[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2011, 19(2): 189-199. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.014.
[50] Huang R J, Grigolon A, Madureira M, et al. Measuring transit-oriented development(TOD)network complementarity based on TOD node typology[J]. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2018, 11(1): 304-324. DOI:10.5198/jtlu.2018.1110.
[51] Zhang M, Xu T, Li X F. Research on TOD typologies of urban rail transit and guidelines for planning and design[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2018.(in Chinese)
[52] Chen J. Research on land-use optimization of multiple types of urban rail transit station areastaking Wuhan metro line 2 as a case[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2016.(in Chinese)
[53] Duan D G, Zhang F. Study on classification of urban rail transit stations from the perspective of land use optimization: A case study on Xi’an subway line 2[J]. City Planning Review, 2013, 37(9): 39-45.(in Chinese)
[54] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development. Guidelines for planning and design of areas along Urban Rail Transit [EB/OL].(2015-11)[2016-05-15]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201512/W020151210101309. pdf.(in Chinese)
[55] Shao Y, Tian F, Lü G L, et al. Transit-oriented development planning and management practice in Shenzhen[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2011, 9(2): 60-66, 21. DOI:10.13813/j.cn11-5141/u.2011.02.016. (in Chinese)
[56] Zhang X C, Tian F, Lü G L, et al. Transit-oriented development framework and planning strategies in Shenzhen[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2011, 9(3): 37-44. DOI:10.13813/j.cn11-5141/u.2011.03.010. (in Chinese)
[57] Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of Guangdong Province. Outline of TOD development master plan for inter-city rail stations in Pearl River Delta[R]. Guangzhou: Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of Guangdong Province, 2011.(in Chinese)
[58] Yuan Y, Zhang P. Developing a TOD typology for Shanghai metro station areas[J]. China Transportation Review, 2020, 42(5): 107-113.(in Chinese)
[59] Zhang K Y, Cao S Y. Evaluation of areas around typical tokyo railway stations based on node-place model[C]//Annual National Planning Conference 2016. Shenyang, China, 2016: 966-976.(in Chinese)
[60] Chen F, Zhang H, Sun Y F. More than “node-place”: Construction of innovative TOD measurement model coupling functional connectivity[J]. Geomatics World, 2020, 27(5): 52-57. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1586.2020.05.009. (in Chinese)
[61] Liu Y Z, Singleton A, Arribas-Bel D. Considering context and dynamics: A classification of transit-orientated development for New York City[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 85: 102711. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102711.

Memo

Memo:
Biography: Bian Yang(1980—), female, doctor, associate professor, bianyang@bjut.edu.cn.
Citation: Bian Yang, Li Ling, Han Tangshan, et al. TOD typology: A review of research achievements[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2021, 37(3):306-316.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2021.03.011.
Last Update: 2021-09-20