|Table of Contents|

[1] Zhang Puyang, Xiong Lichao, Le Conghuan, Dong Hongji, et al. Comparison analysis of the bearing capacity of rock-socketed piles and sand piles for offshore wind turbines [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2023, 39 (4): 384-392. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2023.04.007]
Copy

Comparison analysis of the bearing capacity of rock-socketed piles and sand piles for offshore wind turbines()
Share:

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:
39
Issue:
2023 4
Page:
384-392
Research Field:
Civil Engineering
Publishing date:
2023-12-20

Info

Title:
Comparison analysis of the bearing capacity of rock-socketed piles and sand piles for offshore wind turbines
Author(s):
Zhang Puyang Xiong Lichao Le Conghuan Dong Hongji Ding Hongyan
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Keywords:
offshore wind power rock-socketed pile(RSP) laboratory test bearing capacity
PACS:
TU473
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2023.04.007
Abstract:
The bearing capacity of rock-socketed piles(RSPs)and sand piles under horizontal loads was compared and analyzed through laboratory-scale model tests. The tests were conducted using phosphogypsum to simulate the underlying rock and compacted sand as the upper layer. Particle analysis tests were conducted prior to the tests to confirm soil uniformity. Cone penetration test(CPT)was performed to evaluate the soil, confirming similar soil conditions for all experimental groups, indicating that any errors arising from soil properties could be neglected. The bearing capacity of RSPs was verified through finite element simulation, the results of which closely matched those of the tests. The results show that the bending moment distribution of RSPs and sand piles is consistent, with their maximum bending moment occurring at a depth of 2-3 times the pile diameter(5 cm). However, the location of the maximum bending moment for RSPs is about 1 pile diameter(5 cm)deeper than that of the sand piles. When the upper layer of sand is shallow, the bearing effect of RSPs is more significant, with an increase in the bearing capacity of about 41% compared to sand piles. In addition, due to the squeezing effect of the rock, the cross-sectional deformation of the RSPs is significantly lower than that of the sand piles.

References:

[1] Le C H, Ren J Y, Wang K, et al. Towing performance of the submerged floating offshore wind turbine under different wave conditions[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(6):633.DOI:10.3390/jmse9060633.
[2] Zeng X M, Shi W, Feng X Y, et al. Investigation of higher-harmonic wave loads and low-frequency resonance response of floating offshore wind turbine under extreme wave groups[J].Marine Structures, 2023, 89: 103401. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103401.
[3] Zhang P Y, Li J Y, Gan Y, et al. Bearing capacity and load transfer of brace topological in offshore wind turbine jacket structure[J].Ocean Engineering, 2020, 199: 107037. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107037.
[4] Zhang P Y, Ding H Y, Le C H, et al. Towing characteristics of large-scale composite bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2013, 29(3): 300-304.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2013.03.013.
[5] Xue S, Yue M, Yan Y, et al. Seismic dynamic response analysis of a jacket offshore wind turbine based on an accurate soil-pile model[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2021, 36(6): 143-151.DOI:10.16146/j.cnki.rndlgc.2021.06.021. (in Chinese)
[6] Liu X Y, Bai X Y, Zhang M Y, et al. Load-bearing characteristics of large-diameter rock-socketed piles based on ultimate load tests[J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 2020: 1-12. DOI: 10.1155/2020/6075607.
[7] He R, Ji J, Zhang J S, et al. Dynamic impedances of offshore rock-socketed monopiles[J].Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(5): 134. DOI: 10.3390/jmse7050134.
[8] Li G, Zhang J L, Liu J, et al. Study on the uplift bearing capacity of rock-socketed piles[J].Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2021, 58(3): 203-208. DOI: 10.1007/s11204-021-09729-9.
[9] Murali A K, Tran K M, Haque A, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of the load-bearing mechanisms of piles socketed in soft rocks[J].Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2022, 55(9): 5555-5576. DOI: 10.1007/s00603-022-02954-0.
[10] Han B, Wang B G, Dai S, et al. Bearing failure mechanism of rock-socketed monopile foundation for offshore wind turbine in weathered-granite seabed[J].Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2023, 41(9): 1026-1037. DOI: 10.1080/1064119x.2022.2116370.
[11] Xu F, Dai G L, Gong W M, et al. Lateral loading of a rock-socketed pile using the strain wedge model based on Hoek-Brown criterion[J].Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(7): 3495. DOI: 10.3390/app12073495.
[12] Det Norske Veritaa. Design of offshore wind turbine structures: DNV-OS-J101[P]. 2014.
[13] Liang F F, Zhang H G, Luo Y, et al. Preliminary experimental research on the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratioof cast-in-place phosphogypsum[J]. Journal of Guizhou University(Natural Sciences), 2013, 30(2): 81-85. DOI:10.15958/j.cnki.gdxbzrb.2013.02.014. (in Chinese)
[14] Zhang P Y, Dong H J, Le C H, et al. Finite element analysis of the horizontal load-bearing characteristics of offshore wind turbine rock-socketed piles[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2021, 42(1): 132-138.DOI:10.11990eu.20195066. (in Chinese)
[15] Tong L Y, Wang Q, Du G Y, et al. Determination of undrained shear strength using piezocone penetration test in clayey soil for bridge foundation[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2011, 27(2): 201-205.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2011.02.018.
[16] Kim J H, Choo Y W, Kim D J, et al. Miniature cone tip resistance on sand in a centrifuge[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2016, 142(3): 1-13. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001425.
[17] Gutiérrez-Ch J G, Senent S, Melentijevic S, et al. A DEM-based factor to design rock-socketed piles considering socket roughness[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2021, 54(7): 3409-3421. DOI: 10.1007/s00603-020-02347-1.
[18] Xing X B, Li X Y, Li W, et al. Numerical analysis of the end-suspended pile and the rock-socketed pile bearing capacity of a soil-rock composite foundation pit[J].Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022, 2022: 1-15. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1199548.
[19] Li Y F, Zhao J H, Xiong Y, et al. Experimental and theoretical research on large-diameter rock-socketed pile embedded depth[J]. Archives of Civil Engineering, 2021, 67(2): 537-550.DOI:10.24425/ace.2021.137184.

Memo

Memo:
Biograph:Zhang Puyang(1978—), male, doctor, associate professor, zpy@tju.edu.cn.
Foundation item: The National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.52171274).
Citation: Zhang Puyang, Xiong Lichao, Le Conghuan, et al. Comparison analysis of the bearing capacity of rock-socketed piles and sand piles for offshore wind turbines[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2023, 39(4):384-392.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2023.04.007.
Last Update: 2023-12-20