[1] Su Jinya, Xie Pengfei, Li Shihua,. Disturbance rejection control for uncertain systems with actuator saturation [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2024, 40 (2): 120-128. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2024.02.002]

Copy

Disturbance rejection control for uncertain systems with actuator saturation()

具有执行器饱和的不确定系统的干扰抑制控制

Share：

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:

40

Issue:

2024 2

Page:

120-128

Research Field:

Automation

Publishing date:

2024-06-13

Info

Title:

Disturbance rejection control for uncertain systems with actuator saturation

具有执行器饱和的不确定系统的干扰抑制控制

Author(s):

Su Jinya;  Xie Pengfei;  Li Shihua

School of Automation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

苏金亚;  谢鹏飞;  李世华

东南大学自动化学院, 南京210096

Keywords:

anti-windup;  disturbance observer;  dynamic compensator;  actuator saturation

抗积分饱和;  干扰观测器;  动态补偿器;  执行器饱和

PACS:

TP13

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2024.02.002

Abstract:

To address the issue that conventional disturbance observer(DO)design did not consider actuator saturation, which is prevalent in practical systems, a DO-based control(DOBC)strategy with anti-windup compensation is proposed. First, the reason of windup phenomenon in the conventional DOBC when the actuator is saturated is studied. Then, an anti-windup compensator is designed by minimizing the performance index, and patched to the DO so that the modified DOBC can effectively handle actuator saturation. Finally, local asymptotic stability analysis is performed on the resulting closed-loop systems. Comparative simulation results show that when there is actuator saturation, the proposed method has smaller errors in position tracking and disturbance estimation, and the designed compensator can maintain the DO states to be as close as possible to those without actuator saturation. This verifies that the proposed method is superior in anti-disturbance and anti-windup.

针对传统的干扰观测器(DO)设计并未考虑实际系统中普遍存在的执行器饱和问题, 提出了一种具有抗饱和补偿的基于干扰观测器的控制(DOBC)策略.首先探究传统DOBC在执行器饱和时产生积分饱和现象的原因;然后通过最小化性能指标设计了一种抗积分饱和的补偿器, 并将其与DO结合, 使得修改后的DOBC能够有效处理执行器饱和;最后对所得闭环系统进行局部渐近稳定性分析.比较仿真结果表明, 存在执行器饱和时, 所提出控制方法具有更小的位置跟踪误差和干扰估计误差, 并且设计的补偿器可以保持DO的状态尽可能接近没有执行器饱和时的状态, 进而验证了所提出控制方法在抗干扰和抗饱和方面具有优越性.

References:

[1] Chen W H, Yang J, Guo L, et al. Disturbance-observer-based control and related methods—An overview[J].IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, 63(2): 1083-1095. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2478397.
[2] Su J Y, Chen W H, Yang J. On relationship between time-domain and frequency-domain disturbance observers and its applications[J].Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2016, 138(9): 091013. DOI: 10.1115/1.4033631.
[3] Gu N, Wang D, Peng Z H, et al. Disturbance observers and extended state observers for marine vehicles: A survey[J].Control Engineering Practice, 2022, 123: 105158. DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105158.
[4] Han J Q. From PID to active disturbance rejection control[J].IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2009, 56(3): 900-906. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2008.2011621.
[5] Mu C X, Sun C Y, Qian C S. Error quaternion fuzzy sliding mode control of attitude for spacecraft based on disturbance observer[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2012, 42(5): 886-891. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2012.05.017. (in Chinese)
[6] Yuan J, Fei S M. System normalization and performance assessment under actuator rate saturation[J].Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 53(4): 692-701. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2023.04.016. (in Chinese)
[7] Cao Y Y, Lin Z L, Ward D G. An antiwindup approach to enlarging domain of attraction for linear systems subject to actuator saturation[J].IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2002, 47(1): 140-145. DOI: 10.1109/9.981734.
[8] Sussmann H, Sontag E, Yang Y. A general result on the stabilization of linear systems using bounded controls[C]//Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. San Antonio, TX, USA, 1993: 1802-1807. DOI: 10.1109/CDC.1993.325264.
[9] Lu Y B, Zhuang W C, Yin G D, et al. Rollover prevention model predictive control of heavy-duty vehicles considering variable curvature[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 52(5): 990-997. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2022.05.020. (in Chinese)
[10] Tarbouriech S, Turner M. Anti-windup design: An overview of some recent advances and open problems[J].IET Control Theory & Applications, 2009, 3(1): 1-19. DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta: 20070435.
[11] Liu J S, Wang X, Liu X, et al. An anti-windup design with local sector and H₂/H_∞ optimization for flight environment simulation system[J].Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, 128: 107787. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107787.
[12] Nguyen T, Jabbari F. Disturbance attenuation for systems with input saturation: An LMI approach[J].IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1999, 44(4): 852-857. DOI: 10.1109/9.754833.
[13] Errouissi R, Ouhrouche M, Chen W H, et al. Robust cascaded nonlinear predictive control of a permanent magnet synchronous motor with antiwindup compensator[J].IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2012, 59(8): 3078-3088. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2011.2167109.
[14] An H, Liu J X, Wang C H, et al. Disturbance observer-based antiwindup control for air-breathing hypersonic vehicles[J].IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, 63(5): 3038-3049. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2016.2516498.
[15] Ran M P, Wang Q, Dong C Y. Stabilization of a class of nonlinear systems with actuator saturation via active disturbance rejection control[J].Automatica(Journal of IFAC), 2016, 63(C): 302-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2015.10.010.
[16] Yu Y, Yuan Y, Yang H J, et al. Nonlinear sampled-data ESO-based active disturbance rejection control for networked control systems with actuator saturation[J].Nonlinear Dynamics, 2019, 95(2): 1415-1434. DOI: 10.1007/s11071-018-4636-9.
[17] Yoon S S, Park J K, Yoon T W. Dynamic anti-windup scheme for feedback linearizable nonlinear control systems with saturating inputs[J].Automatica(Journal of IFAC), 2008, 44(12): 3176-3180. DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2008.10.003.
[18] Kapoor N, Daoutidis P. An observer-based anti-windup scheme for non-linear systems with input constraints[J].International Journal of Control, 1999, 72(1): 18-29. DOI: 10.1080/002071799221361.
[19] Su J Y, Li B B, Chen W H. On existence, optimality and asymptotic stability of the Kalman filter with partially observed inputs[J].Automatica(Journal of IFAC), 2015, 53(C): 149-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2014.12.044.
[20] Park J K, Choi C H. Dynamic compensation method for multivariable control systems with saturating actuators[J].IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1995, 40(9): 1635-1640. DOI: 10.1109/9.412636.

Memo

Memo:

Biographies: Su Jinya(1990—), male, doctor, professor; Li Shihua(corresponding author), male, doctor, professor, lsh@seu.edu.cn.
Foundation items: The National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 62303110), the Start-Up Research Fund of Southeast University(No. RF1028623226).
Citation: Su Jinya, Xie Pengfei, Li Shihua.Disturbance rejection control for uncertain systems with actuator saturation[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2024, 40(2):120-128.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2024.02.002.

Common functions