|Table of Contents|

[1] Jiang Shanghua*, Feng Qinchao, Jiang Xiaogan, Xu Nanrong, et al. Decision-Making Method for Problem of Goal TypeBased on Evaluation Criterion [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2002, 18 (3): 254-258. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2002.03.012]
Copy

Decision-Making Method for Problem of Goal TypeBased on Evaluation Criterion()
基于评价准则的目标理想点类型多目标决策方法
Share:

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:
18
Issue:
2002 3
Page:
254-258
Research Field:
Economy and Management
Publishing date:
2002-09-30

Info

Title:
Decision-Making Method for Problem of Goal TypeBased on Evaluation Criterion
基于评价准则的目标理想点类型多目标决策方法
Author(s):
Jiang Shanghua* Feng Qinchao Jiang Xiaogan Xu Nanrong
School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
蒋尚华 冯勤超 江孝感 徐南荣
东南大学经济管理学院, 南京 210096
Keywords:
multi-objective decision-making evaluation criterion fault-measure of evaluation criterion pre-optimized objective set
多目标决策 评价准则 偏差测度 准最优目标集
PACS:
F202
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2002.03.012
Abstract:
The presently-existing decision-making method for problem of goal type, i.e. the goal-programming, is popular to some extent. In this paper we analyzed the features of the problem and the method, based on which we found some defects of the method and pointed out these defects. To overcome these defects we absorbed the spirit and exploited concepts of evaluation criterion and the fault-measure of evaluation criterion. We proposed and applied a method with an evaluation criterion, after which we also proposed a numerical example to illustrate applicability and efficiency of the method. Thus, we found a new type of method to tackle the decision-making problem of goal type.
现有的求解目标理想点类型决策问题的方法——目标规划法, 在某种程度上是较为常用的方法.本文分析了该问题及方法的特点.在此基础上发现了该方法的缺陷并加以指出.为了克服这些缺陷, 利用了评价准则及其偏差测度的概念, 提出并运用了基于评价准则的方法, 给出了一个数值运算的例子, 展示了该方法的可用性及有效性.我们发现了一种新类型的方法来求解目标理想点类型决策问题.

References:

[1] Shin Wan S, Ravindran A. Interactive multiple objective opti ̄mization: survey I — continuous case[J]. Computers Ops Res, 1991, 18(1):97-114.
[2] Evans G W. An overview of techniques solving multiobjective mathematical programs[J]. Mgmt Sci, 1984, 30:1268-1282.
[3] Rosenthal R E. Concepts, theory and techniques: principles of multiobjective optimization[J]. Decis Sci, 1985, 16:133-152.
[4] Stewart T J. A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice. OMEGA Int J of Mgmt Sci, 1992, 20(5, 6): 569-586.
[5] Jiang Shanghua, Xu Nanrong. Multi-objective decision-making method based on evaluation criterion and its fault-measure[J]. Journal of Southeast University, 1999, 27(5):33-37.(in Chinese)
[6] Geoffrion A M, Dyer J S, Feinberg A. An interactive approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to the operation of an academic department[J]. Mgmt Sci, 1972, 19: 357-368.
[7] Zionts S, Walenius J. An interactive programming method for solving the multiple criteria problem[J]. Mgmt Sci, 1976, 22: 652-663.
[8] Zionts S, Wallenius J. An interactive multiple objective linear programming method for a class of underlying non-linear utility functions[J]. Mgmt Sci, 1983, 29: 519-529.

Memo

Memo:
* Born in 1969, male, doctor.
Last Update: 2002-09-20