|Table of Contents|

[1] Zhang Wei, Zhong Weijun, Mei Shue, et al. R&D subsidy policy of domestic firmconsidering foreign firm competition [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2016, 32 (4): 513-519. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2016.04.020]
Copy

R&D subsidy policy of domestic firmconsidering foreign firm competition()
考虑国外企业竞争的国内企业研发补贴策略
Share：

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:
32
Issue:
2016 4
Page:
513-519
Research Field:
Economy and Management
Publishing date:
2016-12-20

Info

Title:
R&D subsidy policy of domestic firmconsidering foreign firm competition
考虑国外企业竞争的国内企业研发补贴策略
Author(s):
Zhang Wei1, 2, Zhong Weijun1, Mei Shu’e1
1School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
2School of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China
张伟1, 2, 仲伟俊1, 梅姝娥1
1东南大学经济管理学院, 南京 211189; 2安徽财经大学统计与应用数学学院, 蚌埠233030
Keywords:
research and development(R&;  D)investment;  investment subsidy;  product subsidy;  technology gap;  foreign firm competition
研发投入;  投入补贴;  产品补贴;  技术差距;  国外企业竞争
PACS:
F224
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2016.04.020
Abstract:
Taking the advanced technology of the foreign firm into account, a mixed duopoly three-stage game model is established in the context of research and development(R&D)investment subsidies and product subsidies for domestic firms provided by the government, and the R&D subsidy policy of domestic firms in competition with foreign firms is analyzed. The equilibrium output, R&D investment of the domestic firm, social welfare and the value of government subsidies are derived, in the case of the two policies, R&D investment subsidies and product subsidies for domestic firms, provided by the government. The results show that, the equilibrium output and the optimal social welfare under the R&D investment subsidy policy are both less than those under the product subsidy policy; the optimal R&D investment under the R&D investment subsidy policy is less than that under the product subsidy policy; and the R&D product subsidy has a more obvious incentive effect on firm R&D investment. Under the background of the leading edge of technology of foreign firms, the product subsidy policy drawn up by the government to encourage R&D innovation of domestic firms is more effective than the R&D investment subsidy policy.
考虑到国外企业的技术领先优势, 在政府给予国内企业研发投入补贴和产品补贴2种情形下, 分别建立了混合双寡头三阶段博弈模型, 分析了国外企业竞争下的国内企业研发补贴策略.得出了在研发投入补贴与产品补贴情形时国内企业的均衡产出、研发投入、最优社会福利以及政府的补贴总额.结果表明, 研发投入补贴策略下的均衡产出和最优社会福利比产品补贴策略下的均衡产出和最优社会福利低;研发投入补贴策略下的最优研发投入低于产品补贴下的最优研发投入;研发产品补贴策略对企业研发投入具有更明显的激励效应.在国外企业技术领先优势下, 政府为激励国内企业研发创新提供产品补贴策略要优于研发投入补贴策略.

References:

[1] Hinloopen J. More on subsidizing cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J]. Journal of Economics, 2000, 72(3): 295-308. DOI:10.1007/bf01231269.
[2] Hinloopen J. Subsidizing R&D cooperatives[J]. De Economist, 2001, 149(3):313-345. DOI:10.1023/A:1011979725764.
[3] Matsumura T. Stackelberg mixed duopoly with a foreign competitor[J]. Bulletin of Economic Research, 2003, 55(3):275-287. DOI:10.1111/1467-8586.00175.
[4] Scrimitore M. Quantity competition vs. price competition under optimal subsidy in a mixed oligopoly[J]. Economic Modelling, 2014, 42:166-176. DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2014.06.006.
[5] Colombo M G, Grilli L, Murtinu S. R&D subsidies and the performance of high-tech start-ups[J]. Economics Letters, 2011, 112(1): 97-99. DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2011.03.007.
[6] Gil-Moltó M J, Poyago-Theotoky J, Zikos V. R&D subsidies, spillovers, and privatization in mixed markets[J]. Southern Economic Journal, 2011, 78(1):233-255. DOI:10.4284/0038-4038-78.1.233.
[7] Dai X Y, Cheng L W. The effect of public subsidies on corporate R&D investment: An application of the generalized propensity score[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015, 90: 410-419. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.014.
[8] Hud M, Hussinger K. The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(10): 1844-1855. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.003.
[9] Bronzini R, Piselli P. The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(2): 442-457. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.008.
[10] Kondo H. International R&D subsidy competition, industrial agglomeration and growth[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2013, 89(1):233-251. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.04.004.
[11] Kesavayuth D, Zikos V. R&D versus output subsidies in mixed markets[J]. Economics Letters, 2013, 118(2):293-296. DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.11.017.
[12] Tomaru Y. Privatization, productive efficiency and social welfare with a foreign competitor[J]. Research in Economics, 2007, 61(4):224-232. DOI:10.1016/j.rie.2007.05.003.
[13] Matsumura T, Matsushima N, Ishibashi I. Privatization and entries of foreign enterprises in a differentiated industry[J]. Journal of Economics, 2009, 98(3):203-219. DOI:10.1007/s00712-009-0091-x.
[14] Wang L F S, Chen T L. Mixed oligopoly, optimal privatization, and foreign penetration[J]. Economic Modelling, 2011, 28(4):1465-1470. DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2011.02.033.
[15] Elberfeld W, Götz G, Stähler F. Vertical foreign direct investment, welfare, and employment[J]. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2005, 5(1):1-30. DOI:10.1515/1538-0653.1280.
[16] Chao C C, Yu E. Partial privatization, foreign competition, and optimum tariff[J]. Review of International Economics, 2006, 14(1):87-92. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9396.2006.00562.x.
[17] Sheng Y C. Innovation subsidies or product subsidies: The government strategy choice of technical alliance[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2008, 16(6):184-192.(in Chinese)
[18] Wang X F. Behavior of cross-border competitive acquisition based on mixed triopoly model[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2013, 22(1):23-30.(in Chinese)

Memo

Memo:
Biographies: Zhang Wei(1982—), male, graduate; Zhong Weijun(corresponding author), male, doctor, professor, zhongweijun@seu.edu.cn.
Foundation item: The Special Project of Innovative Methods and Work Funded by Ministry of National Science and Technology of China(No.2013IM030600).
Citation: Zhang Wei, Zhong Weijun, Mei Shu’e. R& D subsidy policy of domestic firm considering foreign firm competition[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2016, 32(4):513-519.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2016.04.020.
Last Update: 2016-12-20