[1] Yang Pinlu, Hu Aiqun,. Correlation-based subblock partition design for PTS approach [J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2010, 26 (1): 1-5. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2010.01001]

Copy

Correlation-based subblock partition design for PTS approach()

Share：

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)[ISSN:1003-7985/CN:32-1325/N]

Volumn:

26

Issue:

2010 1

Page:

1-5

Research Field:

Information and Communication Engineering

Publishing date:

2010-03-30

Info

Title:

Correlation-based subblock partition design for PTS approach

Author(s):

Yang Pinlu;  Hu Aiqun

School of Information Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

Keywords:

orthogonal frequency division multiplexing(OFDM);  peak-to-average power ratio(PAPR);  partial transmit sequences(PTS);  subblock partition

PACS:

TN929.5;TN919.3

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1003-7985.2010.01001

Abstract:

In order to exploit the capability of the peak-to-average power ratio(PAPR)reduction afforded by the partial transmit sequences(PTS)approach in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing(OFDM)systems, subblock partition schemes for the PTS approach are studied. The motivation is to establish the relationship between the subblock partition and the capability of PAPR reduction through the periodic autocorrelation functions(ACFs)of partial transmit sequences and the periodic cross-correlation functions(CCFs)of signal candidates.Let Q represent the variation of the square magnitudes of ACFs.It is found that the lower the Q-value is, the better PAPR performance can be achieved, which is introduced as a design criterion for subblock partition.Based on this criterion, four common partition methods are compared and an efficient partition strategy is proposed. It is shown that structured partition schemes with low computational complexity have a large Q-value, leading to a poor PAPR performance.The new strategy can be regarded as a trade-off between PAPR performance and computational complexity.The simulation results show that the strategy can achieve an optimal performance with a relatively low complexity and, moreover, does not increase the amount of side information.

References:

[1] Bingham J A C. Multicarrier modulation for data transmission: an idea whose time has come [J]. IEEE Commun Mag, 1990, 28(5): 5-14.
[2] Jones A E, Wilkinson T A, Barton S K. Block coding scheme for reduction of peak to mean envelope power ratio of multicarrier transmission schemes [J]. Electron Lett, 1994, 30(25): 2098-2099.
[3] Han S H, Lee J H. An overview of peak-to-average power ratio reduction techniques for multicarrier transmission [J]. IEEE Wireless Commun, 2005, 12(2): 56-65.
[4] Muller S H, Huber J B. OFDM with reduced peak-to-average power ratio by optimum combination of partial transmit sequences [J]. Electron Lett, 1997, 33(5): 368-369.
[5] Chen H, Pottie G J. An orthogonal projection-based approach for PAR reduction in OFDM [J]. IEEE Commun Lett, 2002, 6(5): 169-171.
[6] Alavi A, Tellambura C, Fair I. PAPR reduction of OFDM signals using partial transmit sequence: an optimal approach using sphere decoding [J]. IEEE Commun Lett, 2005, 9(11): 982-984.
[7] Muller S, Huber J B. A novel peak power reduction scheme for OFDM [C]//Proc IEEE PIMRC’97. Helsinki, Finland, 1997: 1090-1094.
[8] Kang S G, Kim J G, Joo E K. A novel subblock partition scheme for partial transmit sequence OFDM [J]. IEEE Trans Broadcast, 1999, 45(3): 333-338.
[9] Lu G, Wu P, Carlemalm-Logothetis C. Enhanced interleaved partitioning PTS for peak-to-average power ratio reduction in OFDM systems [J]. Electron Lett, 2006, 42(17): 983-984.
[10] Tellambura C. Computation of the continuous-time PAR of an OFDM signal with BPSK subcarriers [J]. IEEE Commun Lett, 2001, 5(5): 185-187.

Memo

Memo:

Biographies: Yang Pinlu(1983—), male, graduate; Hu Aiqun(corresponding author), male, doctor, professor, aqhu@seu.edu.cn.
Citation: Yang Pinlu, Hu Aiqun. Correlation-based subblock partition design for PTS approach[J]. Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2010, 26(1): 1-5.

Common functions